USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Kelsey-hayes-company

USPTO PatentsView assignee record — 53 granted patents across 30 technology areas, active 2015–2022. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: F16D (COUPLINGS FOR TRANSMITTING ROTATION; CLUTCHES; BRAKES).

53
Total patents granted
30
CPC technology areas
16.3
Avg claims per patent
-92%
5-year filing velocity

The verdict

Kelsey-hayes-company holds 53 US patents across 30 technology areas — rank #6,351 of 50,000 tracked assignees.

#6,351
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 26%
by Innovation Score (44.4/100)
16.3
avg claims per patent
-92%
filing velocity, last 5 yrs

Portfolio overview

KELSEY-HAYES-COMPANY has been granted 53 US utility patents between 2015 and 2022, placing KELSEY-HAYES-COMPANY at rank #6,351 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 30 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 16.3 claims per patent with primary concentration in F16D (COUPLINGS FOR TRANSMITTING ROTATION; CLUTCHES; BRAKES). As a US Corporation, KELSEY-HAYES-COMPANY is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. The composite Innovation Score of 44.4/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 4 grants, compared with 49 in the 2015–2019 window — a -92% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.

Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. KELSEY-HAYES-COMPANY's 16.3 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while a multi-domain presence across 30 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark KELSEY-HAYES-COMPANY against peers pursuing similar technology classes.

How does KELSEY-HAYES-COMPANY compare?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus the largest corporate holders — this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows KELSEY-HAYES-COMPANY holds 53 patents — placing it at rank #6,351 overall, well behind the volume leaders but ahead of the tens of thousands of smaller assignees in the dataset.

Source USPTO PatentsView — granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

KELSEY-HAYES-COMPANY's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

44 Top 26% higher than 74% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). Below this entry. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). Below this entry. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). This entry sits in this band. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). Above this entry. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView — PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2022

051015 2015201620172018201920202022 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2022

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
KELSEY-HAYES-COMPANY patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 10 18.9%
2016 11 20.8%
2017 13 24.5%
2018 8 15.1%
2019 7 13.2%
2020 2 3.8%
2022 2 3.8%

Which technologies does KELSEY-HAYES-COMPANY patent most?

Top 15 of 30 technology areas

Patent Moat Analysis

Portfolio Volume Light
Tech Breadth Multi-domain
Claim Depth Standard
Velocity Declining

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#6,351

Across all tracked assignees

Innovation Score

44.4 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView — US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

How many patents does KELSEY-HAYES-COMPANY hold?
KELSEY-HAYES-COMPANY holds 53 US granted patents filed between 2015 and 2022, spanning 30 technology areas.
What is KELSEY-HAYES-COMPANY's Innovation Score?
KELSEY-HAYES-COMPANY has an Innovation Score of 44.4 out of 100. This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), filing velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does KELSEY-HAYES-COMPANY focus on?
KELSEY-HAYES-COMPANY's top technology area is F16D (COUPLINGS FOR TRANSMITTING ROTATION; CLUTCHES; BRAKES) with 24 patents. The company has filed patents in 30 CPC subclasses total.
Is KELSEY-HAYES-COMPANY's patent filing rate increasing or decreasing?
KELSEY-HAYES-COMPANY's recent filing velocity is -92% compared to the prior five-year period. Filing activity has slowed relative to earlier years.
What does claim depth mean for KELSEY-HAYES-COMPANY's patents?
KELSEY-HAYES-COMPANY's patents average 16.3 claims each. This falls within the standard range, providing solid legal coverage.
How is the KELSEY-HAYES-COMPANY patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

Learn More

How to use this portfolio

Kelsey-hayes-company's 53 grants land it in the top 26% by Innovation Score — but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance — Kelsey-hayes-company ranks #6,351 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in F16D — see who else leads that technology area. F16D leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity — not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Explore the patent dataset

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView — official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView — the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) — the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search — the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov