Johnson Technologies Corporation
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Johnson ranks #41,134 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #41,134
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 28th percentile
- by Innovation Score (28.7/100)
- 21.0
- avg claims per patent
- -50%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R41134 · US Corporation #41,134 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #41,134/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH John Cockerill
- CPC-NARROW Y10T · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 28.7/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 21.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -50% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: John Cockerill SA (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Johnson’s 28.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Johnson
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Johnson · this assignee 29
Johnson · this assignee
29 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Johnson's Innovation Score is 28.7/100 (28th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Johnson?
Each dot is one of Johnson’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Johnson’s own 21.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.5 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Johnson's grants concentrate
Johnson Technologies Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Johnson sits between John Cockerill SA and Joral LLC.
Who files at Johnson's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- John Cockerill
John Cockerill SA
6 patents
- John Deere Electr…
John Deere Electric Powertrain LLC
6 patents
- John Ryan Perform…
John Ryan Performance, Inc.
6 patents
- Johnson Solid Sta…
Johnson Solid State, LLC
6 patents
- Joint-stock Scien…
Joint-Stock Company Scientific Research and Design Institute for Energy Technologies Atomproekt
6 patents
- Jolly Innovation…
Jolly Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- Jooster IP
Jooster IP AG
6 patents
- Joral
Joral LLC
6 patents
- Johnson ◀
Johnson Technologies Corporation
6 patents
What this shows Johnson holds 6 patents at rank #41,120, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Johnson
By rank, the assignees closest to #41,120 in granted patent volume.
- John Cockerill SA #41,116 · 6 patents
- John Deere Electric Powertrain LLC #41,117 · 6 patents
- John Ryan Performance, Inc. #41,118 · 6 patents
- Johnson Solid State, LLC #41,119 · 6 patents
- Joint-Stock Company Scientific Research and Design Institute for Energy Technologies Atomproekt #41,121 · 6 patents
- Jolly Innovation Technology Co., Ltd. #41,122 · 6 patents
- Jooster IP AG #41,123 · 6 patents
- Joral LLC #41,124 · 6 patents
Leaders in Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Johnson's primary technology class.
Johnson's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
29 28th percentile higher than 28% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2018 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2020 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2021 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does Johnson Technologies Corporation patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Johnson Technologies Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Johnson Technologies Corporation's lead technology class is Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore Y10T
- Ranked #41,134 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Johnson Technologies Corporation against John Cockerill SA, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 28.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.