Overall rank by patents
#41,116
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 14 technology areas, active 2022–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: C21D (MODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING).
The verdict
John holds 6 US patents across 14 technology areas, rank #41,116 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
John Cockerill Sa has been granted 6 US utility patents between 2022 and 2025, placing John Cockerill Sa at rank #41,116 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 14 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 14.5 claims per patent with primary concentration in C21D (MODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING). As a Foreign Corporation, John Cockerill Sa is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, John sits between Jiaxing Bepal Technology Co., Ltd. (6 patents, rank #41,112) and Johnson Technologies Corporation (6 patents, rank #41,120) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 48.6/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Historical data spans 2022 through 2025, with 6 total grants over that period. Velocity comparisons require five years of historical filings to calibrate. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. John Cockerill Sa's 14.5 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 14 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark John Cockerill Sa against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Jiaxing Bepal Technology Co., Ltd.
6 patents
Jinhua Gica Baby Products Co., Ltd.
6 patents
Jmatek (Zhongshan) Ltd.
6 patents
John Cockerill Defense SA
6 patents
John Deere Electric Powertrain LLC
6 patents
John Ryan Performance, Inc.
6 patents
Johnson Solid State, LLC
6 patents
Johnson Technologies Corporation
6 patents
John Cockerill SA
6 patents
What this shows John holds 6 patents at rank #41,116, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #41,116 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in John's primary technology class.
John's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
49 Top 16% higher than 84% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2022–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2023 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2024 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2025 | 1 | 16.7% |
Top 14 of 14 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#41,116
Across all tracked assignees
48.6 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
John's 6 grants land it in the top 16% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.