Overall rank by patents
#41,123
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 10 technology areas, active 2019–2019. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A47J (KITCHEN EQUIPMENT; COFFEE MILLS; SPICE MILLS; APPARATUS FOR MAKING BEVERAGES).
The verdict
Jooster holds 6 US patents across 10 technology areas, rank #41,123 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Jooster IP Ag has been granted 6 US utility patents between 2019 and 2019, placing Jooster IP Ag at rank #41,123 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 10 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 7.8 claims per patent with primary concentration in A47J (KITCHEN EQUIPMENT; COFFEE MILLS; SPICE MILLS; APPARATUS FOR MAKING BEVERAGES). As a Foreign Corporation, Jooster IP Ag is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Jooster sits between Johnson Solid State, Llc (6 patents, rank #41,119) and Juicero, Inc. (6 patents, rank #41,127) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 22.6/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 0 grants, compared with 6 in the 2015–2019 window, a -100% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Jooster IP Ag's 7.8 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while concentration in 10 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Jooster IP Ag against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Johnson Solid State, LLC
6 patents
Johnson Technologies Corporation
6 patents
Joint-Stock Company Scientific Research and Design Institute for Energy Technologies Atomproekt
6 patents
Jolly Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.
6 patents
Joral LLC
6 patents
Journey Medical Corporation
6 patents
Juggernaut Defense, LLC
6 patents
Juicero, Inc.
6 patents
Jooster IP AG
6 patents
What this shows Jooster holds 6 patents at rank #41,123, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #41,123 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Jooster's primary technology class.
Jooster's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
23 Top 89% higher than 11% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 6 | 100.0% |
Top 10 of 10 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#41,123
Across all tracked assignees
22.6 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Jooster's 6 grants land it in the top 89% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.