Inpro/Seal LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 20 granted patents across 9 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16J (Pistons ; CYLINDERS; Sealings).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Inpro/seal ranks #14,694 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 20 patents across 9 technology areas.
- #14,694
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 48%
- by Innovation Score (35.9/100)
- 15.7
- avg claims per patent
- -45%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R14694 · US Corporation #14,694 · 20 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-SMALL 20 grants
- MID-PACK #14,694/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Impax Laboratories
- CPC-NARROW F16J · 9 areas
- INNOV-THIN 35.9/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 15.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -45% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Impax Laboratories, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Inpro/seal’s 35.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Inpro/seal
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Inpro/Seal · this assignee
Inpro/Seal · this assignee
36 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Inpro/seal's Innovation Score is 35.9/100 (top 48% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Inpro/seal?
Each dot is one of Inpro/seal’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Inpro/seal’s own 15.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Inpro/seal's grants concentrate
Inpro/Seal LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 9 CPC subclasses with 70% of grants classified under F16J (Pistons ; CYLINDERS; Sealings). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Inpro/seal sits between Impax Laboratories, LLC and Intervene, Inc..
Inpro/seal's three-year grant acceleration
Inpro/Seal LLC shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Inpro/Seal's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Impax Laboratories
Impax Laboratories, LLC
20 patents
- Inmobi Pte
InMobi Pte Ltd.
20 patents
- Ingrain
Ingrain, Inc.
20 patents
- Inova
Inova Ltd.
20 patents
- Insight Photonic…
Insight Photonic Solutions, Inc
20 patents
- Intellian
Intellian Technologies, Inc.
20 patents
- International Tes…
International Test Solutions, LLC
20 patents
- Intervene
Intervene, Inc.
20 patents
- Inpro/Seal ◀
Inpro/Seal LLC
20 patents
What this shows Inpro/Seal holds 20 patents at rank #14,694, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Inpro/Seal
By rank, the assignees closest to #14,694 in granted patent volume.
- Impax Laboratories, LLC #14,690 · 20 patents
- InMobi Pte Ltd. #14,691 · 20 patents
- Ingrain, Inc. #14,692 · 20 patents
- Inova Ltd. #14,693 · 20 patents
- Insight Photonic Solutions, Inc #14,695 · 20 patents
- Intellian Technologies, Inc. #14,696 · 20 patents
- International Test Solutions, LLC #14,697 · 20 patents
- Intervene, Inc. #14,698 · 20 patents
Leaders in F16J (Pistons)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Inpro/Seal's primary technology class.
Inpro/seal's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
36 Top 48% higher than 52% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 4 | 20.0% |
| 2016 | 1 | 5.0% |
| 2017 | 3 | 15.0% |
| 2019 | 3 | 15.0% |
| 2021 | 2 | 10.0% |
| 2023 | 1 | 5.0% |
| 2024 | 3 | 15.0% |
| 2025partial year | 3 | 15.0% |
Which technologies does Inpro/Seal LLC patent most?
Top 9 of 9 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Inpro/Seal LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Inpro/Seal LLC's lead technology class is F16J (Pistons ; CYLINDERS; Sealings), 70% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16J
- Ranked #14,694 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Inpro/Seal LLC against Impax Laboratories, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 35.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.