Overall rank by patents
#3,564
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 103 granted patents across 44 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: B64U (UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES [UAV]; EQUIPMENT THEREFOR).
The verdict
In-situ holds 103 US patents across 44 technology areas, rank #3,564 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
In-situ, Inc. has been granted 103 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing In-situ, Inc. at rank #3,564 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 44 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 20.8 claims per patent with primary concentration in B64U (UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES [UAV]; EQUIPMENT THEREFOR). As a US Corporation, In-situ, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, In-situ sits between Evogene Ltd. (103 patents, rank #3,560) and Magnecomp Corporation (103 patents, rank #3,568) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 56.9/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 60 grants, compared with 43 in the 2015–2019 window, a +40% shift in five-year velocity. Steady filing volume suggests sustained innovation without dramatic pivots. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. In-situ, Inc.'s 20.8 average claims per patent reflects complex, broadly scoped inventions that are difficult for competitors to design around, while a multi-domain presence across 44 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark In-situ, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
EVOGENE LTD.
103 patents
FLOS S.P.A.
103 patents
Fastly, Inc.
103 patents
FlatFrog Laboratories AB
103 patents
Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation, Chosun University
103 patents
LIFETECH SCIENTIFIC (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD.
103 patents
MSA Technology, LLC
103 patents
Magnecomp Corporation
103 patents
IN-SITU, INC.
103 patents
What this shows In-situ holds 103 patents at rank #3,564, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #3,564 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in In-situ's primary technology class.
In-situ's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
57 Top 6% higher than 94% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 1.0% |
| 2016 | 8 | 7.8% |
| 2017 | 13 | 12.6% |
| 2018 | 7 | 6.8% |
| 2019 | 14 | 13.6% |
| 2020 | 9 | 8.7% |
| 2021 | 18 | 17.5% |
| 2022 | 7 | 6.8% |
| 2023 | 11 | 10.7% |
| 2024 | 12 | 11.7% |
| 2025 | 3 | 2.9% |
Top 15 of 44 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#3,564
Across all tracked assignees
56.9 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
In-situ's 103 grants land it in the top 6% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.