Where does ImagineAR, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), ImagineAR, Inc. ranks #47,613 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does ImagineAR, Inc. hold?

ImagineAR, Inc. holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2021 and 2024, spanning 5 technology areas.

What is ImagineAR, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

ImagineAR, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 49.0 out of 100 (top 15% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is ImagineAR, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for ImagineAR, Inc..

What does claim depth mean for ImagineAR, Inc.'s patents?

ImagineAR, Inc.'s patents average 24.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the ImagineAR, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

ImagineAR, Inc.

Q: What technology areas does ImagineAR, Inc. focus on?

ImagineAR, Inc.'s top technology area is A63F (Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR) with 3 patents, ranking #392 of 894 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 5 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2021–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63F (Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Imaginear ranks #47,613 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 5 technology areas.

#47,613
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 15%
by Innovation Score (49.0/100): 24.8
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R47613 · Foreign Corporation #47,613 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
BOTTOM-DECILE #47,613/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Idemia America
CPC-NARROW A63F · 5 areas
INNOV-PAR 49.0/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 24.8 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
SPAN-YRS 2021–2024 · 4y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Idemia America Corp. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Imaginear’s 49.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (13%) Velocity 20.0 pts (41%) Breadth 7.9 pts (16%) Claim depth 14.9 pts (30%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
ImagineAR · this assignee

49
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Imaginear's Innovation Score is 49.0/100 (top 15% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Imaginear?

Each dot is one of Imaginear’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Imaginear’s own 24.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Imaginear vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Imaginear's grants concentrate

ImagineAR, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 60% of grants classified under A63F (Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, Imaginear sits between Idemia America Corp. and Immudex ApS.

Imaginear's three-year grant acceleration

ImagineAR, Inc. shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Idemia America

5
Ikonopedia

5
Image Analyser

5
Imagine Intellige…

5
Imagineering Werks

5
Immersive Wisdom

5
Immortazyme

5
Immudex Aps

5
Imaginear ◀

5

What this shows ImagineAR holds 5 patents at rank #47,758, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near ImagineAR

By rank, the assignees closest to #47,758 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A63F (Card)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in ImagineAR's primary technology class.

Imaginear's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

49 Top 15% higher than 85% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2021–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2021–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

ImagineAR, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2021	1	20.0%
2022	1	20.0%
2023	1	20.0%
2024	2	40.0%

Which technologies does ImagineAR, Inc. patent most?

A63F - Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 3

G06V - Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding 2

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 2

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 2

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 2

Top 5 of 5 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

ImagineAR, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

ImagineAR, Inc.'s lead technology class is A63F (Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 60% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63F
Ranked #47,613 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare ImagineAR, Inc. against Idemia America Corp., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 49.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.