Where does Good Sportsman Marketing, LLC rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Good Sportsman Marketing, LLC ranks #12,021 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Good Sportsman Marketing, LLC hold?

Good Sportsman Marketing, LLC holds 25 US utility patents granted between 2019 and 2025, spanning 16 technology areas.

What is Good Sportsman Marketing, LLC's Innovation Score?

Good Sportsman Marketing, LLC has an Innovation Score of 50.9 out of 100 (top 12% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Good Sportsman Marketing, LLC focus on?

Good Sportsman Marketing, LLC's top technology area is B26B (Hand-held Cutting Tools NOT Otherwise Provided FOR) with 4 patents, ranking #63 of 239 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 16 CPC subclasses total.

Is Good Sportsman Marketing, LLC's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Good Sportsman Marketing, LLC's recent grant velocity is +1900% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Good Sportsman Marketing, LLC's patents?

Good Sportsman Marketing, LLC's patents average 9.2 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Good Sportsman Marketing, LLC patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Good Sportsman Marketing, LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 25 granted patents across 16 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B26B (Hand-held Cutting Tools NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Good ranks #12,021 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 25 patents across 16 technology areas.

#12,021
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 12%
by Innovation Score (50.9/100): 9.2
avg claims per patent: +1900%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R12021 · US Corporation #12,021 · 25 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 25 grants
UPPER-Q #12,021/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Georgia-Pacific…
CPC-FOCUS B26B · 16 areas
INNOV-PAR 50.9/100
CLAIMS-PAR 9.2 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +1900% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Georgia-Pacific Corrugated LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Good’s 50.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 11.3 pts (22%) Velocity 20.0 pts (39%) Breadth 14.1 pts (28%) Claim depth 5.5 pts (11%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
China Telecom · near

51
Good Sportsman… · this assignee

51
MOR Research… · near

51
Toray Advanced… · near

51
The Ergo Baby Carrier · near

51
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Good's Innovation Score is 50.9/100 (top 12% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Good?

Each dot is one of Good’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Good’s own 9.2 claims/patent is at or below the 13.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Good vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Good's grants concentrate

Good Sportsman Marketing, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 16 CPC subclasses with 16% of grants classified under B26B (Hand-held Cutting Tools NOT Otherwise Provided FOR). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (8 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Good sits between Guangdong Xizhongxi Technology Co., Ltd. and GumGum, Inc..

Good's three-year grant acceleration

Good Sportsman Marketing, LLC shows 16 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Guangdong Xizhong…

25
Gurunavi

25
Georgia-pacific C…

25
Global Nuclear Fu…

25
Goody Products

25
Graphenix Develop…

25
Guangxi Liugong M…

25
Gumgum

25
Good Sportsman Ma… ◀

25

What this shows Good holds 25 patents at rank #12,024, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Good

By rank, the assignees closest to #12,024 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B26B (Hand-held Cutting Tools)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Good's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Good, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In B26B (Hand-held Cutting Tools), Good ranks #63 of 239 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (51 here).

Toray Advanced Materials Korea Inc. 51 MOR Research Applications Ltd. 51 China Telecom Corporation Limited 51 The Ergo Baby Carrier, Inc. 51

Good's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

51 Top 12% higher than 88% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Good Sportsman Marketing, LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2019	1	4.0%
2020	2	8.0%
2021	2	8.0%
2022	8	32.0%
2023	4	16.0%
2024	4	16.0%
2025partial year	4	16.0%

Which technologies does Good Sportsman Marketing, LLC patent most?

B26B - Hand-held Cutting Tools NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 4

F41A - Functional Features OR Details Common TO Both Smallarms AND Ordnance, e.g. CANNONS; Mountings FOR Smallarms OR Ordnance 2

F41B - Weapons FOR Projecting Missiles Without USE OF Explosive OR Combustible Propellant CHARGE; Weapons NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 2

H04R - Loudspeakers, Microphones, Gramophone Pick-ups OR Like Acoustic Electromechanical TRANSDUCERS; Deaf-aid SETS; Public Address Systems 2

A61F - Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive DEVICES; FOMENTATION; Treatment OR Protection OF Eyes OR EARS; Bandages, Dressings OR Absorbent PADS; Firs 2

A01M - Catching, Trapping OR Scaring OF Animals ; Apparatus FOR THE Destruction OF Noxious Animals OR Noxious Plants 2

G02B - Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus 1

G03B - Apparatus OR Arrangements FOR Taking Photographs OR FOR Projecting OR Viewing THEM; Apparatus OR Arrangements Employing Analogous Techniques Using Waves Other Than Optical WAVES; Accessories Therefor 1

H04N - Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television 1

F41G - Weapon SIGHTS; Aiming 1

E04B - General Building CONSTRUCTIONS; Walls, e.g. PARTITIONS; ROOFS; FLOORS; CEILINGS; Insulation OR Other Protection OF Buildings 1

E04H - Buildings OR Like Structures FOR Particular PURPOSES; Swimming OR Splash Baths OR POOLS; MASTS; FENCING; Tents OR Canopies, IN General 1

B08B - Cleaning IN GENERAL; Prevention OF Fouling IN General 1

A22C - Processing Meat, Poultry, OR Fish 1

H01Q - Antennas, i.e. Radio Aerials 1

Top 15 of 16 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Good Sportsman Marketing, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Good Sportsman Marketing, LLC's lead technology class is B26B (Hand-held Cutting Tools NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 16% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B26B
Ranked #12,021 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Good Sportsman Marketing, LLC against Guangdong Xizhongxi Technology Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 50.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.