CPC technology class · F41
F41G - Weapon Sights
Weapon sights; aiming. 2,623 US utility patents granted 2015–2025, with the leading assignees and year-by-year filing trajectory.
- 2,623
- US patents granted
- F41
- Parent CPC class
- 20
- Active assignees
- +6%
- 5-yr velocity
The verdict
Weapon Sights ranks #342 of 670 CPC technology areas - 2,623 US patents granted since 2015, with filing up 6% over five years.
- #342
- of 670 CPC technology areas
- 2,623
- US patents granted, 2015–2025
- Raytheon
- leading assignee (105)
- +6%
- filing velocity, last 5 yrs
CPC subclass F41G - WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING - covers 2,623 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025 according to USPTO PatentsView records, within the broader CPC class F41 (WEAPONS). See our CPC classification guide for how the system works.
The competitive landscape in F41G is shaped by 20 distinct companies actively filing in this space. Raytheon Company leads with 105 patents, followed by BAE Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. at 86 grants and Sheltered Wings, Inc. at 64.
Filing activity in F41G is up 6% over the past five years versus 2015-2019, a relatively steady filing pace. All counts come directly from USPTO PatentsView and reflect US granted utility patents only.
Is F41G innovation accelerating?
US utility-patent grants per year in F41G, 2015–2025 - recent five years are up 6% versus 2015–2019.
Who leads F41G?
The 12 most active assignees in WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING - wider bars mean more grants
- Raytheon
Raytheon Company
105 patents
- Bae Systems Informati…
BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration Inc.
86 patents
- Sheltered Wings
Sheltered Wings, Inc.
64 patents
- Sig Sauer
SIG SAUER INC.
45 patents
- Leupold & Stevens 40
Leupold & Stevens, Inc.
40 patents
- Wilcox Industries 33
Wilcox Industries Corp.
33 patents
- Crosman 31
Crosman Corporation
31 patents
- Cubic 30
Cubic Corporation
30 patents
- Swarovski-optik & Kg 27
Swarovski-Optik AG & Co KG.
27 patents
- Hvrt 27
HVRT CORP.
27 patents
- Aerovironment 25
AeroVironment, Inc.
25 patents
- Magpul Industries 25
Magpul Industries Corp.
25 patents
What this shows Raytheon is the most active filer in F41G, holding 105 of the 2,623 patents in this class. Concentration at the top signals how contestable this technology area is for new entrants.
View data table
| Rank | Company | Patents in F41G |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Raytheon Company | 105 |
| #2 | BAE Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. | 86 |
| #3 | Sheltered Wings, Inc. | 64 |
| #4 | SIG Sauer Inc. | 45 |
| #5 | Leupold & Stevens, Inc. | 40 |
| #6 | Wilcox Industries Corp. | 33 |
| #7 | Crosman Corporation | 31 |
| #8 | Cubic Corporation | 30 |
| #9 | Swarovski-optik Ag & Co KG. | 27 |
| #10 | HVRT Corp. | 27 |
| #11 | Aerovironment, Inc. | 25 |
| #12 | Magpul Industries Corp. | 25 |
| #13 | Emissive Energy Corp. | 24 |
| #14 | Sintai Optical (shenzhen) Co., Ltd. | 22 |
| #15 | Crimson Trace Corporation | 21 |
| #16 | Rosemount Aerospace Inc. | 20 |
| #17 | Orbital Research Inc. | 20 |
| #18 | Trackingpoint, Inc. | 19 |
| #19 | Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd. | 18 |
| #20 | Raytheon Canada Limited | 18 |
About This Class
CPC subclass F41G belongs to class F41.
2,623 patents were granted in this class between 2015 and 2025.
20 companies actively patent in this space.
Classification System
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) is a hierarchical patent classification system used by the USPTO and EPO.
Footprint here vs. claim strategy
Each dot is a leading F41G assignee, placed by how many patents it holds in this class (horizontal) against its company-wide average claims per patent (vertical) - a read on whether the class is led by broad-but-shallow filers or focused deep-claim players.
Top 14 F41G assignees by class footprint. Bubble size = patents in F41G. Source: USPTO PatentsView (claim depth is company-wide across all classes).
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CPC class F41G?
How many patents have been filed in F41G?
Which company holds the most patents in F41G?
How is patent data for F41G collected?
What is the difference between CPC class and subclass?
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.