Exergy S.P.A.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 11 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F01D (Non-positive Displacement Machines OR Engines, e.g. Steam Turbines).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Exergy ranks #40,136 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 11 technology areas.
- #40,136
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 19th percentile
- by Innovation Score (26.1/100)
- 12.8
- avg claims per patent
- -50%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R40136 · Foreign Corporation #40,136 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #40,136/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Earth
- CPC-FOCUS F01D · 11 areas
- INNOV-THIN 26.1/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 12.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -50% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Earth Corporation (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Exergy’s 26.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Exergy
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Exergy S P A · this assignee 26
Exergy S P A · this assignee
26 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Exergy's Innovation Score is 26.1/100 (19th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Exergy?
Each dot is one of Exergy’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Exergy’s own 12.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Exergy's grants concentrate
Exergy S.P.A. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 11 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under F01D (Non-positive Displacement Machines OR Engines, e.g. Steam Turbines). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Exergy sits between Evoa, LLC and Earth Corporation.
Who files at Exergy's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Evoa
Evoa, LLC
6 patents
- Evolis
Evolis
6 patents
- Evolution Aqua
Evolution Aqua Limited
6 patents
- Exergy Internatio…
Exergy International S.R.L.
6 patents
- EXP Services
EXP Services Inc.
6 patents
- Extreme Reality
Extreme Reality Ltd.
6 patents
- Extremity Develop…
Extremity Development Company, LLC
6 patents
- Earth
Earth Corporation
6 patents
- Exergy S P A ◀
Exergy S.P.A.
6 patents
What this shows Exergy holds 6 patents at rank #40,027, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Exergy
By rank, the assignees closest to #40,027 in granted patent volume.
- Evoa, LLC #40,023 · 6 patents
- Evolis #40,024 · 6 patents
- Evolution Aqua Limited #40,025 · 6 patents
- Exergy International S.R.L. #40,026 · 6 patents
- EXP Services Inc. #40,028 · 6 patents
- Extreme Reality Ltd. #40,029 · 6 patents
- Extremity Development Company, LLC #40,030 · 6 patents
- Earth Corporation #40,031 · 6 patents
Leaders in F01D (Non-positive Displacement Machines OR Engines)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Exergy's primary technology class.
- General Electric Company 3,837 in class
- United Technologies Corporation 2,869 in class
- Raytheon Technologies Corporation 1,770 in class
- Safran Aircraft Engines 1,240 in class
- Rolls-royce plc 1,115 in class
- Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. 965 in class
- Rolls-Royce Corporation 734 in class
- RTX Corporation 638 in class
Exergy's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
26 19th percentile higher than 19% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2017 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2018 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2020 | 2 | 33.3% |
Which technologies does Exergy S.P.A. patent most?
Top 11 of 11 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Exergy S.P.A.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Exergy S.P.A.'s lead technology class is F01D (Non-positive Displacement Machines OR Engines, e.g. Steam Turbines), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F01D
- Ranked #40,136 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Exergy S.P.A. against Evoa, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 26.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.