Extremity Development Company, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 1 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Extremity ranks #40,145 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 1 technology areas.
- #40,145
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 2nd percentile
- by Innovation Score (13.9/100)
- 6.0
- avg claims per patent
- -80%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R40145 · US Corporation #40,145 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #40,145/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Earth
- CPC-NARROW A61B · 1 areas
- INNOV-LOW 13.9/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 6.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -80% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Earth Corporation (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Extremity’s 13.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Extremity
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Extremity Development · this assignee 14
Extremity Development · this assignee
14 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Extremity's Innovation Score is 13.9/100 (2nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Extremity?
Each dot is one of Extremity’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Extremity’s own 6.0 claims/patent is at or below the 9.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Extremity's grants concentrate
Extremity Development Company, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 1 CPC subclasses with 16.7% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, Extremity sits between Exergy International S.R.L. and Echo Box Audio, LLC.
Who files at Extremity's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Exergy Internatio…
Exergy International S.R.L.
6 patents
- Exergy S P A
Exergy S.P.A.
6 patents
- EXP Services
EXP Services Inc.
6 patents
- Extreme Reality
Extreme Reality Ltd.
6 patents
- Earth
Earth Corporation
6 patents
- Earth Renaissance
Earth Renaissance Technologies, LLC
6 patents
- Earthwell
Earthwell, Inc.
6 patents
- Echo Box Audio
Echo Box Audio, LLC
6 patents
- Extremity Develop… ◀
Extremity Development Company, LLC
6 patents
What this shows Extremity holds 6 patents at rank #40,030, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Extremity
By rank, the assignees closest to #40,030 in granted patent volume.
- Exergy International S.R.L. #40,026 · 6 patents
- Exergy S.P.A. #40,027 · 6 patents
- EXP Services Inc. #40,028 · 6 patents
- Extreme Reality Ltd. #40,029 · 6 patents
- Earth Corporation #40,031 · 6 patents
- Earth Renaissance Technologies, LLC #40,032 · 6 patents
- Earthwell, Inc. #40,033 · 6 patents
- Echo Box Audio, LLC #40,034 · 6 patents
Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Extremity's primary technology class.
- Covidien LP 5,709 in class
- Koniniklijke Philips N.V. 3,414 in class
- Olympus Corporation 2,758 in class
- Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. 2,362 in class
- Cilag GmbH International 2,063 in class
- Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. 1,921 in class
- DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. 1,796 in class
- Ethicon, Inc. 1,762 in class
Extremity's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
14 2nd percentile higher than 2% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 3 | 50.0% |
| 2019 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2021 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does Extremity Development Company, LLC patent most?
Top 1 of 1 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Extremity Development Company, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Extremity Development Company, LLC's lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 16.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
- Ranked #40,145 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Extremity Development Company, LLC against Exergy International S.R.L., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 13.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.