Evolution Aqua Limited
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C02F (Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Evolution ranks #40,123 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 6 technology areas.
- #40,123
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 33%
- by Innovation Score (41.4/100)
- 10.0
- avg claims per patent
- +400%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R40123 · Foreign Corporation #40,123 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #40,123/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Evermore United
- CPC-NARROW C02F · 6 areas
- INNOV-PAR 41.4/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 10.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-SURGE +400% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Evermore United S.A. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Evolution’s 41.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Evolution
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Evolution Aqua · this assignee
Evolution Aqua · this assignee
41 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Evolution's Innovation Score is 41.4/100 (top 33% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Evolution?
Each dot is one of Evolution’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Evolution’s own 10.0 claims/patent is at or below the 13.3 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Evolution's grants concentrate
Evolution Aqua Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 33.3% of grants classified under C02F (Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Evolution sits between Evermore United S.A. and Extreme Reality Ltd..
Evolution's three-year grant acceleration
Evolution Aqua Limited shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Evolution's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Evermore United
Evermore United S.A.
6 patents
- Eversys
Eversys S.A.
6 patents
- Evoa
Evoa, LLC
6 patents
- Evolis
Evolis
6 patents
- Exergy Internatio…
Exergy International S.R.L.
6 patents
- Exergy S P A
Exergy S.P.A.
6 patents
- EXP Services
EXP Services Inc.
6 patents
- Extreme Reality
Extreme Reality Ltd.
6 patents
- Evolution Aqua ◀
Evolution Aqua Limited
6 patents
What this shows Evolution holds 6 patents at rank #40,025, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Evolution
By rank, the assignees closest to #40,025 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in C02F (Treatment OF Water)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Evolution's primary technology class.
- Ecolab USA Inc. 243 in class
- King Fahd University OF Petroleum AND Minerals 188 in class
- Evoqua Water Technologies LLC 177 in class
- Saudi Arabian OIL Company 147 in class
- Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies Support 82 in class
- Kurita Water Industries Ltd. 80 in class
- Nanjing University 75 in class
- Kemira OYJ 55 in class
Evolution's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
41 Top 33% higher than 67% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2022 | 4 | 66.7% |
| 2024 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does Evolution Aqua Limited patent most?
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Evolution Aqua Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Evolution Aqua Limited's lead technology class is C02F (Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge), 33.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C02F
- Ranked #40,123 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Evolution Aqua Limited against Evermore United S.A., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 41.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.