EtaGen, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 21 granted patents across 15 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F02B (Internal-combustion Piston ENGINES; Combustion Engines IN General).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Etagen ranks #13,976 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 21 patents across 15 technology areas.
- #13,976
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 38%
- by Innovation Score (39.4/100)
- 25.3
- avg claims per patent
- -95%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R13976 · US Corporation #13,976 · 21 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-SMALL 21 grants
- MID-PACK #13,976/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Enable Injections
- CPC-FOCUS F02B · 15 areas
- INNOV-THIN 39.4/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 25.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -95% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Enable Injections, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Etagen’s 39.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Etagen
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- EtaGen · this assignee
EtaGen · this assignee
39 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Etagen's Innovation Score is 39.4/100 (top 38% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Etagen?
Each dot is one of Etagen’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Etagen’s own 25.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Etagen's grants concentrate
EtaGen, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 15 CPC subclasses with 71.4% of grants classified under F02B (Internal-combustion Piston ENGINES; Combustion Engines IN General). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (9 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Etagen sits between Enable Injections, Inc. and Exegy Incorporated.
Who files at EtaGen's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Enable Injections
Enable Injections, Inc.
21 patents
- Energy Full
Energy Full Electronics Co., Ltd
21 patents
- Epivax
EpiVax Inc.
21 patents
- Erber
Erber AG
21 patents
- Evonik Oxeno & KG
Evonik Oxeno GmbH & Co. KG
21 patents
- Exabeam
Exabeam, Inc.
21 patents
- Excelitas Canada
Excelitas Canada, Inc.
21 patents
- Exegy Incorporated
Exegy Incorporated
21 patents
- Etagen ◀
EtaGen, Inc.
21 patents
What this shows EtaGen holds 21 patents at rank #13,977, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near EtaGen
By rank, the assignees closest to #13,977 in granted patent volume.
- Enable Injections, Inc. #13,973 · 21 patents
- Energy Full Electronics Co., Ltd #13,974 · 21 patents
- EpiVax Inc. #13,975 · 21 patents
- Erber AG #13,976 · 21 patents
- Evonik Oxeno GmbH & Co. KG #13,978 · 21 patents
- Exabeam, Inc. #13,979 · 21 patents
- Excelitas Canada, Inc. #13,980 · 21 patents
- Exegy Incorporated #13,981 · 21 patents
Leaders in F02B (Internal-combustion Piston Engines)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in EtaGen's primary technology class.
- Ford Global Technologies, LLC 1,028 in class
- BorgWarner Inc. 344 in class
- Mazda Motor Corporation 317 in class
- Caterpillar Inc. 309 in class
- Cummins Inc. 240 in class
- Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Engine & Turbocharger, Ltd. 178 in class
- Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. 174 in class
- IHI Corporation 167 in class
Etagen's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
39 Top 38% higher than 62% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 4 | 19.0% |
| 2017 | 3 | 14.3% |
| 2018 | 4 | 19.0% |
| 2019 | 9 | 42.9% |
| 2020 | 1 | 4.8% |
Which technologies does EtaGen, Inc. patent most?
Top 15 of 15 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
EtaGen, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- EtaGen, Inc.'s lead technology class is F02B (Internal-combustion Piston ENGINES; Combustion Engines IN General), 71.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F02B
- Ranked #13,976 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare EtaGen, Inc. against Enable Injections, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 39.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.