EcoServices, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 19 granted patents across 16 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F01D (Non-positive Displacement Machines OR Engines, e.g. Steam Turbines).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Ecoservices ranks #15,240 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 19 patents across 16 technology areas.
- #15,240
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 49%
- by Innovation Score (35.6/100)
- 18.5
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R15240 · US Corporation #15,240 · 19 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 19 grants
- MID-PACK #15,240/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Eagle Eye Networks
- CPC-FOCUS F01D · 16 areas
- INNOV-THIN 35.6/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 18.5 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Eagle Eye Networks, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Ecoservices’s 35.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Ecoservices
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- EcoServices · this assignee
EcoServices · this assignee
36 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Ecoservices's Innovation Score is 35.6/100 (top 49% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Ecoservices?
Each dot is one of Ecoservices’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Ecoservices’s own 18.5 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Ecoservices's grants concentrate
EcoServices, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 16 CPC subclasses with 94.7% of grants classified under F01D (Non-positive Displacement Machines OR Engines, e.g. Steam Turbines). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (7 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2018. By volume, Ecoservices sits between EOG Resources, Inc. and Edison Welding Institute, Inc..
Who files at EcoServices's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- EOG Resources
EOG Resources, Inc.
19 patents
- Exeger Operations…
Exeger Operations AB
19 patents
- Eagle Eye Networks
Eagle Eye Networks, Inc.
19 patents
- Eastern Virginia…
Eastern Virginia Medical School
19 patents
- Edgeq
EdgeQ, Inc.
19 patents
- Edible IP
Edible IP, LLC
19 patents
- Edison Labs
Edison Labs, Inc.
19 patents
- Edison Welding In…
Edison Welding Institute, Inc.
19 patents
- Ecoservices ◀
EcoServices, LLC
19 patents
What this shows EcoServices holds 19 patents at rank #15,246, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near EcoServices
By rank, the assignees closest to #15,246 in granted patent volume.
- EOG Resources, Inc. #15,242 · 19 patents
- Exeger Operations AB #15,243 · 19 patents
- Eagle Eye Networks, Inc. #15,244 · 19 patents
- Eastern Virginia Medical School #15,245 · 19 patents
- EdgeQ, Inc. #15,247 · 19 patents
- Edible IP, LLC #15,248 · 19 patents
- Edison Labs, Inc. #15,249 · 19 patents
- Edison Welding Institute, Inc. #15,250 · 19 patents
Leaders in F01D (Non-positive Displacement Machines OR Engines)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in EcoServices's primary technology class.
- General Electric Company 3,837 in class
- United Technologies Corporation 2,869 in class
- Raytheon Technologies Corporation 1,770 in class
- Safran Aircraft Engines 1,240 in class
- Rolls-royce plc 1,115 in class
- Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. 965 in class
- Rolls-Royce Corporation 734 in class
- RTX Corporation 638 in class
Ecoservices's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
36 Top 49% higher than 51% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 7 | 36.8% |
| 2016 | 3 | 15.8% |
| 2017 | 7 | 36.8% |
| 2018 | 2 | 10.5% |
Which technologies does EcoServices, LLC patent most?
Top 15 of 16 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
EcoServices, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- EcoServices, LLC's lead technology class is F01D (Non-positive Displacement Machines OR Engines, e.g. Steam Turbines), 94.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F01D
- Ranked #15,240 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare EcoServices, LLC against EOG Resources, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 35.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.