PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Dignity Health

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 156 granted patents across 53 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION).

Explore the portfolio See the ranking
156
Total patents granted
53
CPC technology areas
15.0
Avg claims per patent
+139%
5-year filing velocity

The verdict

Dignity holds 156 US patents across 53 technology areas, rank #2,501 of 50,000 tracked assignees.

#2,501
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 5%
by Innovation Score (57.9/100)
15.0
avg claims per patent
+139%
filing velocity, last 5 yrs

Portfolio overview

Dignity Health has been granted 156 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Dignity Health at rank #2,501 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 53 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 15.0 claims per patent with primary concentration in A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION). As a US Corporation, Dignity Health is one of the broader-portfolio assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Dignity sits between Axalta Coating Systems IP Co., Llc (156 patents, rank #2,497) and National Applied Research Laboratories (156 patents, rank #2,505) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 57.9/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 110 grants, compared with 46 in the 2015–2019 window, a +139% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.

Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Dignity Health's 15.0 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while a multi-domain presence across 53 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Dignity Health against peers pursuing similar technology classes.

Who files at Dignity's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Dignity holds 156 patents at rank #2,501, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Dignity

By rank, the assignees closest to #2,501 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Dignity's primary technology class.

Dignity's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

58 Top 5% higher than 95% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). Below this entry. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). Below this entry. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). This entry sits in this band. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0510152025 20152016201720182019202020212022202320242025 24
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Dignity Health patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 4 2.6%
2016 7 4.5%
2017 8 5.1%
2018 9 5.8%
2019 18 11.5%
2020 19 12.2%
2021 16 10.3%
2022 15 9.6%
2023 19 12.2%
2024 17 10.9%
2025 24 15.4%

Which technologies does Dignity Health patent most?

Top 15 of 53 technology areas

Patent Moat Analysis

Portfolio Volume Moderate
Tech Breadth Multi-domain
Claim Depth Standard
Velocity Accelerating

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#2,501

Across all tracked assignees

Innovation Score

57.9 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

How many patents does Dignity Health hold?
Dignity Health holds 156 US granted patents filed between 2015 and 2025, spanning 53 technology areas.
What is Dignity Health's Innovation Score?
Dignity Health has an Innovation Score of 57.9 out of 100. This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), filing velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does Dignity Health focus on?
Dignity Health's top technology area is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION) with 77 patents. The company has filed patents in 53 CPC subclasses total.
Is Dignity Health's patent filing rate increasing or decreasing?
Dignity Health's recent filing velocity is +139% compared to the prior five-year period. This indicates accelerating innovation.
What does claim depth mean for Dignity Health's patents?
Dignity Health's patents average 15.0 claims each. This falls within the standard range, providing solid legal coverage.
How is the Dignity Health patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

How to use this portfolio

Dignity's 156 grants land it in the top 5% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - Dignity ranks #2,501 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in A61B - see who else leads that technology area. A61B leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.