PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

CyberArk Software Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 156 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication).

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Cyberark ranks #2,500 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 156 patents across 7 technology areas.

#2,500
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 26%
by Innovation Score (44.1/100)
21.1
avg claims per patent
+129%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R2500 · Foreign Corporation #2,500 · 156 grants

GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MID 156 grants
  • TOP-DECILE #2,500/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Accedian Networks
  • CPC-NARROW H04L · 7 areas
  • INNOV-PAR 44.1/100
  • CLAIMS-DENSE 21.1 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-SURGE +129% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Accedian Networks Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Cyberark’s 44.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Cyberark

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Cyberark's Innovation Score is 44.1/100 (top 26% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cyberark?

Each dot is one of Cyberark’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cyberark’s own 21.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Cyberark vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 155.9155.9156156.1 510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Accedian Networks Inc. - 156, 11.69Accedian NetworksAxalta Coating Systems IP Co., LLC - 156, 15.94Axalta Coating Sy…Applied Biosystems, LLC - 156, 16.12Applied BiosystemsB1 Institute OF Image Technology, Inc. - 156, 7.25B1 Institute OF I…Dignity Health - 156, 15.04Dignity HealthKhalifa University of Science and Technology - 156, 17.21Khalifa Universit…MS Technologies - 156, 20.6MSNational Chung Cheng University - 156, 10.69National Chung Ch…CyberArk Software Ltd. - 156, 21.15Cyberark Software
Cyberark vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Cyberark's grants concentrate

CyberArk Software Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 81.4% of grants classified under H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (32 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Cyberark sits between Accedian Networks Inc. and National Chung Cheng University.

Cyberark's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, CyberArk Software Ltd. moved from 71 to 49 grants (0.69x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #2,185. See the growth leaderboard.

Who files at CyberArk's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows CyberArk holds 156 patents at rank #2,500, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near CyberArk

By rank, the assignees closest to #2,500 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in CyberArk's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for CyberArk, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information), CyberArk ranks #309 of 8,956 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (44 here).

Tachi-s Co., Ltd. 44 Public University Corporation Yokohama City University 44 Clearside Biomedical, Inc. 44 Hopkins Manufacturing Corporation 44

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (21.1 here).

Skydio, Inc. 21.1 avg DSP Group Ltd. 21.1 avg Sonic IP, LLC 21.1 avg Avigilon Fortress Corporation 21.1 avg

Cyberark's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

44 Top 26% higher than 74% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

010203040 20152016201720182019202020212022202320242025 8
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
CyberArk Software Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 1 0.6%
2016 2 1.3%
2017 9 5.8%
2018 16 10.3%
2019 17 10.9%
2020 32 20.5%
2021 22 14.1%
2022 17 10.9%
2023 16 10.3%
2024 16 10.3%
2025partial year 8 5.1%

Which technologies does CyberArk Software Ltd. patent most?

Top 7 of 7 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

CyberArk Software Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • CyberArk Software Ltd.'s lead technology class is H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication), 81.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04L
  • Ranked #2,500 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare CyberArk Software Ltd. against Accedian Networks Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 44.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.