Overall rank by patents
#2,296
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 170 granted patents across 64 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: F16K (VALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; DEVICES FOR VENTING OR AERATING).
The verdict
CKD holds 170 US patents across 64 technology areas, rank #2,296 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
CKD Corporation has been granted 170 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing CKD Corporation at rank #2,296 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 64 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 9.7 claims per patent with primary concentration in F16K (VALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; DEVICES FOR VENTING OR AERATING). As a Foreign Corporation, CKD Corporation is one of the broader-portfolio assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, CKD sits between Shanghai Zhaoxin Semiconductor Co., Ltd. (171 patents, rank #2,292) and Metaswitch Networks Ltd. (170 patents, rank #2,300) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 53.3/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 108 grants, compared with 62 in the 2015–2019 window, a +74% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. CKD Corporation's 9.7 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while a multi-domain presence across 64 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark CKD Corporation against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
SHANGHAI ZHAOXIN SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.
171 patents
TTI (MACAO COMMERCIAL OFFSHORE) LIMITED
171 patents
Terra Nova Nurseries, Inc.
171 patents
U.S. Department of Energy
171 patents
CYNTEC CO., LTD.
170 patents
ENERGIZER BRANDS, LLC
170 patents
ITT MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISES LLC
170 patents
MetaSwitch Networks Ltd.
170 patents
CKD Corporation
170 patents
What this shows CKD holds 170 patents at rank #2,296, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #2,296 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in CKD's primary technology class.
CKD's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
53 Top 9% higher than 91% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 11 | 6.5% |
| 2016 | 18 | 10.6% |
| 2017 | 5 | 2.9% |
| 2018 | 10 | 5.9% |
| 2019 | 18 | 10.6% |
| 2020 | 19 | 11.2% |
| 2021 | 27 | 15.9% |
| 2022 | 17 | 10.0% |
| 2023 | 13 | 7.6% |
| 2024 | 16 | 9.4% |
| 2025 | 16 | 9.4% |
Top 15 of 64 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#2,296
Across all tracked assignees
53.3 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
CKD's 170 grants land it in the top 9% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.