USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Cerebras Systems Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 49 granted patents across 14 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06N (COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

Total patents granted

CPC technology areas

32.8

Avg claims per patent

+457%

5-year grant velocity

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Cerebras ranks #6,752 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 49 patents across 14 technology areas.

#6,752
of 50,000 US assignees by volume: Top 21%
by Innovation Score (46.4/100): 32.8
avg claims per patent: +457%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

Portfolio overview

Cerebras Systems Inc. has been granted 49 US utility patents between 2019 and 2025, placing Cerebras Systems Inc. at #6,752 of 50,000 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 14 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 32.8 claims per patent with primary concentration in G06N (COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS). As a US Corporation, Cerebras Systems Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Cerebras sits between Cal-comp BIG DATA, Inc. (49 patents, rank #6,749) and DAKO Denmark A/s (49 patents, rank #6,757) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 46.4/100 blends portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Grant cadence records the difference between two grant-year windows. Between 2020 and 2024 the company received 39 grants, compared with 7 in the 2015–2019 window, a +457% shift in five-year grant velocity. Both windows cover five complete grant years; the latest PatentsView year is a partial release and is excluded from this comparison, though it still appears in the yearly table and chart below. Grant timing can lag the related application by years, so this comparison does not establish current R&D spending, strategic intent, or a company’s application activity. The US Corporation classification provides context for the assignee record, not a conclusion about its business strategy.

Claim depth and technology breadth describe this aggregate record. Cerebras Systems Inc.'s 32.8 average claims per patent is an average count, not a measure of claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk. The record spans 14 CPC subclasses. Combined with portfolio volume, these figures let readers compare the documented grant records of assignees in similar technology classes.

Cal-comp BIG DATA

49
Cooler Master Tec…

49
Cardinal CG

49
Caterpillar Globa…

49
Coopersurgical

49
Corbett Lair

49
Cray

49
DAKO Denmark A/S

49
Cerebras Systems ◀

49

What this shows Cerebras holds 49 patents at rank #6,753, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Cerebras

By rank, the assignees closest to #6,753 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Mo…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cerebras's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Cerebras, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (46 here).

Leupold & Stevens, Inc. 46 THE Secant Group, Llc 46 Blue Buffalo Enterpises, Inc. 46 Norsk Hydro ASA 46

Cerebras's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

46 Top 21% higher than 79% of 50,000 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Cerebras Systems Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2019	7	14.3%
2020	10	20.4%
2021	10	20.4%
2022	10	20.4%
2023	6	12.2%
2024	3	6.1%
2025partial year	3	6.1%

Which technologies does Cerebras Systems Inc. patent most?

G06N - COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS 27

G06F - ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING 25

H01L - SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10 22

H04L - TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION 8

Y02P - CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS 8

H05K - PRINTED CIRCUITS; CASINGS OR CONSTRUCTIONAL DETAILS OF ELECTRIC APPARATUS; MANUFACTURE OF ASSEMBLAGES OF ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS 8

H01R - ELECTRICALLY-CONDUCTIVE CONNECTIONS; STRUCTURAL ASSOCIATIONS OF A PLURALITY OF MUTUALLY-INSULATED ELECTRICAL CONNECTING ELEMENTS; COUPLING DEVICES; CURRENT COLLECTORS 4

B32B - LAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM 4

Y02D - CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES [ICT], I.E. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES AIMING AT THE REDUCTION OF THEIR OWN ENERGY USE 4

H10D - INORGANIC ELECTRIC SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES 2

C09K - MATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE 2

B23K - SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM 2

G03F - PHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR; 1

G06T - IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL 1

Top 14 of 14 technology areas

Grant record at a glance

Portfolio Volume 49 grants

CPC subclasses 14

Avg. claims / grant 32.8

Velocity +457%

Historical grant data only; it does not rate legal strength or current strategy.

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#6,752

of 50,000 tracked assignees

Innovation Score

46.4 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does Cerebras Systems Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Cerebras Systems Inc. ranks #6,752 of 50,000 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Cerebras Systems Inc. hold?

Cerebras Systems Inc. holds 49 US utility patents granted between 2019 and 2025, spanning 14 technology areas.

What is Cerebras Systems Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Cerebras Systems Inc. has an Innovation Score of 46.4 out of 100 (top 21% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Cerebras Systems Inc. focus on?

Cerebras Systems Inc.'s top technology area is G06N (COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS) with 27 patents. Grants appear in 14 CPC subclasses total.

Is Cerebras Systems Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Cerebras Systems Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +457% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Cerebras Systems Inc.'s patents?

Cerebras Systems Inc.'s patents average 32.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Cerebras Systems Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

How to use this portfolio

Cerebras's 49 grants land it in the top 21% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - Cerebras ranks #6,752 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
Most of this portfolio concentrates in G06N - see who else leads that technology area. G06N leaders
Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.