Where does Braskem S.A. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Braskem S.A. ranks #3,300 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Braskem S.A. hold?

Braskem S.A. holds 113 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 56 technology areas.

What is Braskem S.A.'s Innovation Score?

Braskem S.A. has an Innovation Score of 67.2 out of 100 (top 1% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Braskem S.A. focus on?

Braskem S.A.'s top technology area is C08F (Macromolecular Compounds Obtained BY Reactions Only Involving Carbon-to-carbon Unsaturated Bonds) with 42 patents, ranking #70 of 1,231 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 56 CPC subclasses total.

Is Braskem S.A.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Braskem S.A.'s recent grant velocity is +239% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Braskem S.A.'s patents?

Braskem S.A.'s patents average 18.7 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Braskem S.A. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Braskem S.A.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 113 granted patents across 56 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C08F (Macromolecular Compounds Obtained BY Reactions Only Involving Carbon-to-carbon Unsaturated Bonds).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Braskem ranks #3,300 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 113 patents across 56 technology areas.

#3,300
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 1%
by Innovation Score (67.2/100): 18.7
avg claims per patent: +239%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R3300 · Foreign Corporation #3,300 · 113 grants

GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-WIDE · INNOV-STRONG · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MID 113 grants
TOP-DECILE #3,300/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Beijing E-Town…
CPC-WIDE C08F · 56 areas
INNOV-STRONG 67.2/100
CLAIMS-RICH 18.7 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +239% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Beijing E-Town Semiconductor Technology Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Braskem’s 67.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 16.4 pts (24%) Velocity 14.6 pts (22%) Breadth 25.0 pts (37%) Claim depth 11.2 pts (17%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Braskem · this assignee

67
GoPro · near

67
NXP B V · near

67
Semiconductor… · near

67
Walmart Apollo · near

67
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Braskem's Innovation Score is 67.2/100 (top 1% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Braskem?

Each dot is one of Braskem’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Braskem’s own 18.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Braskem vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

How Braskem's grant cadence moved

Between 2020–2024, Braskem S.A. received 78 grants versus 23 in 2015–2019 (+239% equal-window velocity, above median growth). Across complete PatentsView years, output peaked in 2023 at 21 grants and bottomed in 2016 at 2. Lead class C08F accounts for 37.2% of the portfolio across 56 subclasses. Volume neighbours: Yokowo Co., Ltd. (#3,296) and Georgia State University Research Foundation (#3,304).

Braskem's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Braskem S.A. moved from 26 to 57 grants (2.19x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #169. See the growth leaderboard.

Yokowo

114
Beijing Naura Mic…

113
Bestway Inflatabl…

113
Beijing E-town Se…

113
Dana Belgium

113
Federal-mogul Ign…

113
Golba

113
Georgia State Uni…

113
Braskem ◀

113

What this shows Braskem holds 113 patents at rank #3,300, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Braskem

By rank, the assignees closest to #3,300 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C08F (Macromolecular Compounds Obtained BY Reactions Only Invol…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Braskem's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Braskem, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In C08F (Macromolecular Compounds Obtained BY Reactions Only Invol…), Braskem ranks #70 of 1,231 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (67 here).

GoPro, Inc. 67 Walmart Apollo, LLC 67 Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC 67 NXP B.V. 67

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (18.7 here).

Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc. 18.7 avg Samsara Inc. 18.7 avg Physio-control, Inc. 18.7 avg Dish Wireless L.L.C. 18.7 avg

Braskem's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

67 Top 1% higher than 99% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Braskem S.A. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	3	2.7%
2016	2	1.8%
2017	7	6.2%
2018	6	5.3%
2019	5	4.4%
2020	8	7.1%
2021	13	11.5%
2022	20	17.7%
2023	21	18.6%
2024	16	14.2%
2025partial year	12	10.6%

Which technologies does Braskem S.A. patent most?

C08F - Macromolecular Compounds Obtained BY Reactions Only Involving Carbon-to-carbon Unsaturated Bonds 42

C08L - Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds 38

C12P - Fermentation OR Enzyme-using Processes TO Synthesise A Desired Chemical Compound OR Composition OR TO Separate Optical Isomers From A Racemic Mixture 28

C12N - Microorganisms OR ENZYMES; Compositions THEREOF; Propagating, Preserving, OR Maintaining MICROORGANISMS; Mutation OR Genetic ENGINEERING; Culture Media 26

C12Y - Enzymes 24

C08K - Use of inorganic or non-macromolecular organic substances as compounding ingredients 21

C08J - WORKING-UP; General Processes OF COMPOUNDING; After-treatment NOT Covered BY Subclasses C08b, C08c, C08f, C08g or C08h 21

B29C - Shaping OR Joining OF PLASTICS; Shaping OF Material IN A Plastic State, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; After-treatment OF THE Shaped Products, e.g. Repairing 15

Y02E - Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution 14

B29K - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclasses B29b, B29c OR B29d, Relating TO Moulding Materials OR TO Materials FOR ; Moulds, ; Reinforcements, Fillers OR Preformed Parts, e.g. Inserts 13

C07C - Acyclic OR Carbocyclic Compounds 12

B01J - Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus 8

B29L - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclass B29c, Relating TO Particular Articles 8

B32B - Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form 7

C07D - Heterocyclic Compounds 7

Top 15 of 56 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Braskem S.A.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Braskem S.A.'s lead technology class is C08F (Macromolecular Compounds Obtained BY Reactions Only Involving Carbon-to-carbon Unsaturated Bonds), 37.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C08F
Ranked #3,300 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Braskem S.A. against Yokowo Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 67.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.