Overall rank by patents
#11,511
of 50,000 tracked assignees
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation
Vibracoustic SE
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 27 granted patents across 12 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2022–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16F (SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; MEANS FOR DAMPING VIBRATION).
27
Total patents granted
12
CPC technology areas
15.8
Avg claims per patent
-
5-year grant velocity
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Vibracoustic ranks #11,511 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 27 patents across 12 technology areas.
- #11,511
- of 50,000 US assignees by volume
- Top 9%
- by Innovation Score (53.3/100)
- 15.8
- avg claims per patent
Portfolio overview
Vibracoustic SE has been granted 27 US utility patents between 2022 and 2025, placing Vibracoustic SE at #11,511 of 50,000 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 12 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 15.8 claims per patent with primary concentration in F16F (SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; MEANS FOR DAMPING VIBRATION). As a Foreign Corporation, Vibracoustic SE is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Vibracoustic sits between Venture Products, Inc. (27 patents, rank #11,504) and Worxsafe AB (27 patents, rank #11,512) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 53.3/100 blends portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Grant cadence records the difference between two grant-year windows. Historical data spans 2022 through 2025, with 27 total grants over that period. Grant timing can lag the related application by years, so this comparison does not establish current R&D spending, strategic intent, or a company’s application activity. The Foreign Corporation classification provides context for the assignee record, not a conclusion about its business strategy.
Claim depth and technology breadth describe this aggregate record. Vibracoustic SE's 15.8 average claims per patent is an average count, not a measure of claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk. The record spans 12 CPC subclasses. Combined with portfolio volume, these figures let readers compare the documented grant records of assignees in similar technology classes.
Who files at Vibracoustic's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Venture Products
Venture Products, Inc.
27 patents
- Verdesian Life Sc…
Verdesian Life Sciences U.S., LLC
27 patents
- Verizon Telematics
Verizon Telematics Inc.
27 patents
- Vertiflex
VertiFlex, Inc.
27 patents
- Vivex Biologics G…
Vivex Biologics Group, Inc.
27 patents
- Wave Computing
Wave Computing, Inc.
27 patents
- Wayne/Scott Fetzer
Wayne/Scott Fetzer Company
27 patents
- Worxsafe AB
Worxsafe AB
27 patents
- Vibracoustic SE ◀
Vibracoustic SE
27 patents
What this shows Vibracoustic holds 27 patents at rank #11,508, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Vibracoustic
By rank, the assignees closest to #11,508 in granted patent volume.
- Venture Products, Inc. #11,504 · 27 patents
- Verdesian Life Sciences U.s., Llc #11,505 · 27 patents
- Verizon Telematics Inc. #11,506 · 27 patents
- Vertiflex, Inc. #11,507 · 27 patents
- Vivex Biologics Group, Inc. #11,509 · 27 patents
- Wave Computing, Inc. #11,510 · 27 patents
- Wayne/scott Fetzer Company #11,511 · 27 patents
- Worxsafe AB #11,512 · 27 patents
Leaders in F16F (Springs)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Vibracoustic's primary technology class.
- Fox Factory, Inc. 263 in class
- Schaeffler Technologies Ag & Co. KG 209 in class
- ZF Friedrichshafen Ag 153 in class
- KYB Corporation 145 in class
- Sumitomo Riko Company Limited 130 in class
- Exedy Corporation 120 in class
- Firestone Industrial Products Company, Llc 114 in class
- Hitachi Astemo, Ltd. 103 in class
Vibracoustic's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
53 Top 9% higher than 91% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2022–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 7 | 25.9% |
| 2023 | 4 | 14.8% |
| 2024 | 8 | 29.6% |
| 2025partial year | 8 | 29.6% |
Which technologies does Vibracoustic SE patent most?
Top 12 of 12 technology areas
Grant record at a glance
Portfolio Volume 27 grants
CPC subclasses 12
Avg. claims / grant 15.8
Historical grant data only; it does not rate legal strength or current strategy.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does Vibracoustic SE rank among US patent assignees?
According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Vibracoustic SE ranks #11,511 of 50,000 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.
How many patents does Vibracoustic SE hold?
Vibracoustic SE holds 27 US utility patents granted between 2022 and 2025, spanning 12 technology areas.
What is Vibracoustic SE's Innovation Score?
Vibracoustic SE has an Innovation Score of 53.3 out of 100 (top 9% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does Vibracoustic SE focus on?
Vibracoustic SE's top technology area is F16F (SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; MEANS FOR DAMPING VIBRATION) with 21 patents. Grants appear in 12 CPC subclasses total.
Is Vibracoustic SE's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?
Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Vibracoustic SE.
What does claim depth mean for Vibracoustic SE's patents?
Vibracoustic SE's patents average 15.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.
How is the Vibracoustic SE patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.
How to use this portfolio
Vibracoustic's 27 grants land it in the top 9% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
- Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - Vibracoustic ranks #11,511 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
- Most of this portfolio concentrates in F16F - see who else leads that technology area. F16F leaders
- Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.