Overall rank by patents
#4,249
of 49,997 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 84 granted patents across 46 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B01F (Mixing, e.g. Dissolving, Emulsifying OR Dispersing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, M. ranks #4,249 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 84 patents across 46 technology areas.
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R4249 · Foreign Corporation #4,249 · 84 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-WIDE · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
Nearest grant-volume peer: Inmar Clearing, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
Elmos Semiconductor SE · near
53 score
HiddenLayer · near
53 score
M Technique · this assignee
53 score
Quadient France · near
53 score
SpringWorks… · near
53 score
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows M.'s Innovation Score is 52.9/100 (top 10% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
M. Technique Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 46 CPC subclasses with 42.9% of grants classified under B01F (Mixing, e.g. Dissolving, Emulsifying OR Dispersing). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (13 grants) versus a trough of 4 in 2020. By volume, M. sits between Inmar Clearing, Inc. and Optis Cellular Technology, LLC.
From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, M. Technique Co., Ltd. moved from 23 to 18 grants (0.78x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). See the growth leaderboard.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Inmar Clearing, Inc.
84 patents
Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
84 patents
Jtekt Europe
84 patents
Kitagawa Industries Co., Ltd.
84 patents
Mallinckrodt Hospital Products IP Unlimited Company
84 patents
National Health Research Institutes
84 patents
Nisca Corporation
84 patents
Optis Cellular Technology, LLC
84 patents
M. Technique Co., Ltd.
84 patents
What this shows M. holds 84 patents at rank #4,249, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #4,249 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in M's primary technology class.
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for M, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (53 here).
Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (13.8 here).
M.'s Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
53 Top 10% higher than 90% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 8 | 9.5% |
| 2016 | 13 | 15.5% |
| 2017 | 9 | 10.7% |
| 2018 | 9 | 10.7% |
| 2019 | 9 | 10.7% |
| 2020 | 4 | 4.8% |
| 2021 | 10 | 11.9% |
| 2022 | 5 | 6.0% |
| 2023 | 8 | 9.5% |
| 2024 | 5 | 6.0% |
| 2025partial year | 4 | 4.8% |
Top 15 of 46 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#4,249
of 49,997 tracked assignees
52.9 out of 100
What to do with this data
M. Technique Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.