Overall rank by patents
#3,971
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 91 granted patents across 38 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: B01J (CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS).
The verdict
JGC holds 91 US patents across 38 technology areas, rank #3,971 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
JGC Catalysts And Chemicals Ltd. has been granted 91 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing JGC Catalysts And Chemicals Ltd. at rank #3,971 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 38 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 12.8 claims per patent with primary concentration in B01J (CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS). As a Foreign Corporation, JGC Catalysts And Chemicals Ltd. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, JGC sits between Galderma Holding Sa (91 patents, rank #3,967) and L&F Plastics, Co., Ltd. (91 patents, rank #3,975) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 52.2/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 50 grants, compared with 41 in the 2015–2019 window, a +22% shift in five-year velocity. Steady filing volume suggests sustained innovation without dramatic pivots. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. JGC Catalysts And Chemicals Ltd.'s 12.8 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while a multi-domain presence across 38 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark JGC Catalysts And Chemicals Ltd. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Galderma Holding SA
91 patents
Hover Inc.
91 patents
IDEXX LABORATORIES INC.
91 patents
IQVIA Inc.
91 patents
Joyetech Europe Holding GmbH
91 patents
KOFAX, INC.
91 patents
Kistler Holding AG
91 patents
L&F PLASTICS, CO., LTD.
91 patents
JGC Catalysts and Chemicals Ltd.
91 patents
What this shows JGC holds 91 patents at rank #3,971, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #3,971 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in JGC's primary technology class.
JGC's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
52 Top 10% higher than 90% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 7 | 7.7% |
| 2016 | 8 | 8.8% |
| 2017 | 9 | 9.9% |
| 2018 | 7 | 7.7% |
| 2019 | 10 | 11.0% |
| 2020 | 8 | 8.8% |
| 2021 | 10 | 11.0% |
| 2022 | 12 | 13.2% |
| 2023 | 9 | 9.9% |
| 2024 | 9 | 9.9% |
| 2025 | 2 | 2.2% |
Top 15 of 38 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#3,971
Across all tracked assignees
52.2 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
JGC's 91 grants land it in the top 10% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.