XYZ Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 14 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2024–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B25J (MANIPULATORS; Chambers Provided With Manipulation Devices).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, XYZ ranks #38,389 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 14 technology areas.
- #38,389
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 13%
- by Innovation Score (50.4/100)
- 16.6
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R38389 · Foreign Corporation #38,389 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- LOWER-Q #38,389/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Xcede
- CPC-FOCUS B25J · 14 areas
- INNOV-PAR 50.4/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 16.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- SPAN-YRS 2024–2025 · 2y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Xcede Technologies, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How XYZ’s 50.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around XYZ
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- XYZ · this assignee
XYZ · this assignee
50 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows XYZ's Innovation Score is 50.4/100 (top 13% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for XYZ?
Each dot is one of XYZ’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). XYZ’s own 16.6 claims/patent is at or below the 18.1 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where XYZ's grants concentrate
XYZ Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 14 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under B25J (MANIPULATORS; Chambers Provided With Manipulation Devices). By volume, XYZ sits between Xlnx, Inc. and Xenocor, Inc..
XYZ's three-year grant acceleration
XYZ Inc. shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at XYZ's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Xlnx
Xlnx, Inc.
7 patents
- Xped Holdings PTY
Xped Holdings PTY Ltd
7 patents
- XR Health IL
XR Health IL Ltd
7 patents
- Xystus
Xystus, LLC
7 patents
- XYZ Robotics Glob…
XYZ Robotics Global Inc.
7 patents
- Xcede
Xcede Technologies, Inc.
7 patents
- Xcerion Aktiebolag
Xcerion Aktiebolag
7 patents
- Xenocor
Xenocor, Inc.
7 patents
- XYZ ◀
XYZ Inc.
7 patents
What this shows XYZ holds 7 patents at rank #38,349, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near XYZ
By rank, the assignees closest to #38,349 in granted patent volume.
- Xlnx, Inc. #38,345 · 7 patents
- Xped Holdings PTY Ltd #38,346 · 7 patents
- XR Health IL Ltd #38,347 · 7 patents
- Xystus, LLC #38,348 · 7 patents
- XYZ Robotics Global Inc. #38,350 · 7 patents
- Xcede Technologies, Inc. #38,351 · 7 patents
- Xcerion Aktiebolag #38,352 · 7 patents
- Xenocor, Inc. #38,353 · 7 patents
Leaders in B25J (Manipulators)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in XYZ's primary technology class.
- Fanuc Corporation 999 in class
- Seiko Epson Corporation 608 in class
- Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. 470 in class
- X Development LLC 351 in class
- Kawasaki Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha 328 in class
- Kabushiki Kaisha Yaskawa Denki 215 in class
- ABB Schweiz AG 214 in class
- Ubtech Robotics Corp Ltd 197 in class
XYZ's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
50 Top 13% higher than 87% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2024–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4 | 57.1% |
| 2025partial year | 3 | 42.9% |
Which technologies does XYZ Inc. patent most?
Top 14 of 14 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
XYZ Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- XYZ Inc.'s lead technology class is B25J (MANIPULATORS; Chambers Provided With Manipulation Devices), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B25J
- Ranked #38,389 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare XYZ Inc. against Xlnx, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 50.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.