Vibracoustic North America L.P.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16F (SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; Means FOR Damping Vibration).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Vibracoustic ranks #33,817 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 5 technology areas.
- #33,817
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 21st percentile
- by Innovation Score (26.7/100)
- 18.6
- avg claims per patent
- -67%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R33817 · US Corporation #33,817 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #33,817/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Via Separations
- CPC-NARROW F16F · 5 areas
- INNOV-THIN 26.7/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 18.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -67% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Via Separations, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Vibracoustic’s 26.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Vibracoustic
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Vibracoustic North… · this assignee 27
Vibracoustic North… · this assignee
27 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Vibracoustic's Innovation Score is 26.7/100 (21st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Vibracoustic?
Each dot is one of Vibracoustic’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Vibracoustic’s own 18.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Vibracoustic's grants concentrate
Vibracoustic North America L.P. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 87.5% of grants classified under F16F (SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; Means FOR Damping Vibration). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Vibracoustic sits between Via Separations, Inc. and ViewRay Systems, Inc..
Who files at Vibracoustic's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Via Separations
Via Separations, Inc.
8 patents
- Viabot
ViaBot Inc.
8 patents
- Viaderm
Viaderm LLC
8 patents
- Vibracoustic CV A…
Vibracoustic CV Air Springs GmbH
8 patents
- Vibracoustic USA
Vibracoustic USA, Inc.
8 patents
- Viela Bio
Viela Bio, Inc.
8 patents
- Viesoft
Viesoft, Inc.
8 patents
- Viewray Systems
ViewRay Systems, Inc.
8 patents
- Vibracoustic Nort… ◀
Vibracoustic North America L.P.
8 patents
What this shows Vibracoustic holds 8 patents at rank #33,821, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Vibracoustic
By rank, the assignees closest to #33,821 in granted patent volume.
- Via Separations, Inc. #33,817 · 8 patents
- ViaBot Inc. #33,818 · 8 patents
- Viaderm LLC #33,819 · 8 patents
- Vibracoustic CV Air Springs GmbH #33,820 · 8 patents
- Vibracoustic USA, Inc. #33,822 · 8 patents
- Viela Bio, Inc. #33,823 · 8 patents
- Viesoft, Inc. #33,824 · 8 patents
- ViewRay Systems, Inc. #33,825 · 8 patents
Leaders in F16F (Springs)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Vibracoustic's primary technology class.
- Fox Factory, Inc. 263 in class
- Schaeffler Technologies AG & Co. KG 209 in class
- ZF Friedrichshafen AG 153 in class
- KYB Corporation 145 in class
- Sumitomo Riko Company Limited 130 in class
- Exedy Corporation 120 in class
- Firestone Industrial Products Company, LLC 114 in class
- Hitachi Astemo, Ltd. 103 in class
Vibracoustic's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
27 21st percentile higher than 21% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2016 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2019 | 3 | 37.5% |
| 2020 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2021 | 1 | 12.5% |
Which technologies does Vibracoustic North America L.P. patent most?
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Vibracoustic North America L.P.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Vibracoustic North America L.P.'s lead technology class is F16F (SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; Means FOR Damping Vibration), 87.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16F
- Ranked #33,817 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Vibracoustic North America L.P. against Via Separations, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 26.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.