Where does Vibracoustic CV Air Springs GmbH rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Vibracoustic CV Air Springs GmbH ranks #33,816 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Vibracoustic CV Air Springs GmbH hold?

Vibracoustic CV Air Springs GmbH holds 8 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2021, spanning 3 technology areas.

What is Vibracoustic CV Air Springs GmbH's Innovation Score?

Vibracoustic CV Air Springs GmbH has an Innovation Score of 21.6 out of 100 (9th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Vibracoustic CV Air Springs GmbH focus on?

Vibracoustic CV Air Springs GmbH's top technology area is F16F (SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; Means FOR Damping Vibration) with 8 patents, ranking #107 of 892 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 3 CPC subclasses total.

Is Vibracoustic CV Air Springs GmbH's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Vibracoustic CV Air Springs GmbH's recent grant velocity is -67% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Vibracoustic CV Air Springs GmbH's patents?

Vibracoustic CV Air Springs GmbH's patents average 13.1 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Vibracoustic CV Air Springs GmbH patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Vibracoustic CV Air Springs GmbH

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16F (SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; Means FOR Damping Vibration).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Vibracoustic ranks #33,816 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 3 technology areas.

#33,816
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 9th percentile
by Innovation Score (21.6/100): 13.1
avg claims per patent: -67%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R33816 · Foreign Corporation #33,816 · 8 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
MID-PACK #33,816/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Verzon Patent and…
CPC-NARROW F16F · 3 areas
INNOV-THIN 21.6/100
CLAIMS-RICH 13.1 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -67% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Verzon Patent and Licensing inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Vibracoustic’s 21.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.6 pts (35%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 6.1 pts (28%) Claim depth 7.9 pts (37%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Vibracoustic CV Air… · this assignee

22
Galemed · near

22
Hanil E-hwa · near

22
US Ginzzu · near

22
Franz Schneider & KG · near

22
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Vibracoustic's Innovation Score is 21.6/100 (9th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Vibracoustic?

Each dot is one of Vibracoustic’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Vibracoustic’s own 13.1 claims/patent is at or below the 18.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Vibracoustic vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Vibracoustic's grants concentrate

Vibracoustic CV Air Springs GmbH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under F16F (SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; Means FOR Damping Vibration). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Vibracoustic sits between Verzon Patent and Licensing inc. and Viesoft, Inc..

Verzon Patent and…

8
Via Separations

8
Viabot

8
Viaderm

8
Vibracoustic Nort…

8
Vibracoustic USA

8
Viela Bio

8
Viesoft

8
Vibracoustic CV A… ◀

8

What this shows Vibracoustic holds 8 patents at rank #33,820, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Vibracoustic

By rank, the assignees closest to #33,820 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F16F (Springs)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Vibracoustic's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Vibracoustic, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In F16F (Springs), Vibracoustic ranks #107 of 892 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (22 here).

US Ginzzu Inc 22 Hanil E-hwa Co., Ltd. 22 Galemed Corporation 22 Franz Schneider GMBH & Co. KG 22

Vibracoustic's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

22 9th percentile higher than 9% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Vibracoustic CV Air Springs GmbH patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	3	37.5%
2017	1	12.5%
2018	1	12.5%
2019	1	12.5%
2021	2	25.0%

Which technologies does Vibracoustic CV Air Springs GmbH patent most?

F16F - SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; Means FOR Damping Vibration 8

B60G - Vehicle Suspension Arrangements 8

B62D - Motor VEHICLES; Trailers 3

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Vibracoustic CV Air Springs GmbH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Vibracoustic CV Air Springs GmbH's lead technology class is F16F (SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; Means FOR Damping Vibration), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16F
Ranked #33,816 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Vibracoustic CV Air Springs GmbH against Verzon Patent and Licensing inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 21.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.