PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

THE Conard Pyle Company

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 107 granted patents across 1 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A01H (NEW Plants OR ; NON-TRANSGENIC; Processes FOR Obtaining THEM; Plant Reproduction BY Tissue Culture Techniques).

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, THE ranks #3,462 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 107 patents across 1 technology areas.

#3,462
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
15th percentile
by Innovation Score (24.6/100)
1.0
avg claims per patent
+77%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R3462 · US Corporation #3,462 · 107 grants

GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MID 107 grants
  • TOP-DECILE #3,462/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Reckitt Benckiser…
  • CPC-NARROW A01H · 1 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 24.6/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-SURGE +77% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Reckitt Benckiser Finish B.V. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around THE

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows THE's Innovation Score is 24.6/100 (15th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Where THE's grants concentrate

THE Conard Pyle Company is a focused PatentsView assignee: 1 CPC subclasses with 0.9% of grants classified under A01H (NEW Plants OR ; NON-TRANSGENIC; Processes FOR Obtaining THEM; Plant Reproduction BY Tissue Culture Techniques). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (21 grants) versus a trough of 5 in 2023. By volume, THE sits between Reckitt Benckiser Finish B.V. and Atomera Incorporated.

THE's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, THE Conard Pyle Company moved from 50 to 32 grants (0.64x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #2,336. See the growth leaderboard.

Who files at THE's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows THE holds 107 patents at rank #3,462, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near THE

By rank, the assignees closest to #3,462 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A01H (NEW Plants OR)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in THE's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for THE, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (25 here).

J-Devices Corporation 25 VAN Cleef & Arpels SA 25 Pham Holdings, Inc. 25 Toontrack Music AB 25

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (1.0 here).

L&F Plastics, Co., Ltd. 1.1 avg EIS GmbH 1.1 avg Spring Meadow Nursery Inc. 1.1 avg BLU DOT Design & Manufacturing, Inc. 1.1 avg

THE's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

25 15th percentile higher than 15% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0510152025 201720182019202020212022202320242025 10
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
THE Conard Pyle Company patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2017 8 7.5%
2018 7 6.5%
2019 20 18.7%
2020 13 12.1%
2021 17 15.9%
2022 6 5.6%
2023 5 4.7%
2024 21 19.6%
2025partial year 10 9.3%

Which technologies does THE Conard Pyle Company patent most?

Top 1 of 1 technology areas

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#3,462

of 49,997 tracked assignees

Innovation Score

24.6 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

THE Conard Pyle Company's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • THE Conard Pyle Company's lead technology class is A01H (NEW Plants OR ; NON-TRANSGENIC; Processes FOR Obtaining THEM; Plant Reproduction BY Tissue Culture Techniques), 0.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A01H
  • Ranked #3,462 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare THE Conard Pyle Company against Reckitt Benckiser Finish B.V., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 24.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.