The Penn State Research Foundation
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 480 granted patents across 188 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61K (Preparations FOR Medical, Dental OR Toiletry Purposes).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, The ranks #930 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 480 patents across 188 technology areas.
- #930
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 3%
- by Innovation Score (61.4/100)
- 16.5
- avg claims per patent
- -10%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R930 · Foreign Corporation #930 · 480 grants
GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-WIDE · INNOV-STRONG · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MID 480 grants
- TOP-DECILE #930/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Schweitzer Engineeri…
- CPC-WIDE A61K · 188 areas
- INNOV-STRONG 61.4/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 16.5 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-FLAT -10% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How The’s 61.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around The
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- IFP Energies Nouvelles · near
IFP Energies Nouvelles · near
61 score
- Nchain Licensing · near
Nchain Licensing · near
61 score
- Gulfstream Aerospace · near
Gulfstream Aerospace · near
61 score
- Harbin Institute OF… · near
Harbin Institute OF… · near
61 score
- The Penn State… · this assignee
The Penn State… · this assignee
61 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows The's Innovation Score is 61.4/100 (top 3% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for The?
Each dot is one of The’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). The’s own 16.5 claims/patent is at or below the 16.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
How The's grant cadence moved
Between 2020–2024, The Penn State Research Foundation received 212 grants versus 236 in 2015–2019 (-10% equal-window velocity, above median growth). Across complete PatentsView years, output peaked in 2017 at 63 grants and bottomed in 2015 at 34. Lead class A61K accounts for 19.2% of the portfolio across 188 subclasses. Volume neighbours: The Swatch Group Research and Development Ltd (#926) and Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (#934).
The's three-year grant acceleration
From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, The Penn State Research Foundation moved from 150 to 116 grants (0.77x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #1,923. See the growth leaderboard.
Who files at The's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- The Swatch Group…
The Swatch Group Research and Development Ltd
482 patents
- Corning Research…
Corning Research & Development Corporation
481 patents
- Conocophillips
ConocoPhillips Company
481 patents
- Schweitzer Engine…
Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc.
480 patents
- The Penn State Re… ◀
The Penn State Research Foundation
480 patents
- Aristocrat
Aristocrat Technologies, Inc.
478 patents
- United States Pos…
United States Postal Service
477 patents
- Caterpillar Pavin…
Caterpillar Paving Products Inc.
476 patents
- Chicago Mercantil…
Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc.
476 patents
What this shows The holds 480 patents at rank #930, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near The
By rank, the assignees closest to #930 in granted patent volume.
- The Swatch Group Research and Development Ltd #926 · 482 patents
- Corning Research & Development Corporation #927 · 481 patents
- ConocoPhillips Company #928 · 481 patents
- Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc. #929 · 480 patents
- Aristocrat Technologies, Inc. #931 · 478 patents
- United States Postal Service #932 · 477 patents
- Caterpillar Paving Products Inc. #933 · 476 patents
- Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. #934 · 476 patents
Leaders in A61K (Preparations FOR Medical)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in The's primary technology class.
- The Regents of the University of California 1,779 in class
- L'Oreal 1,250 in class
- Novartis AG 988 in class
- The Procter & Gamble Company 985 in class
- The Board of Regents of the University of Texas System 950 in class
- The United States of America, as represented by the Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services 813 in class
- The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania 768 in class
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC 760 in class
Assignees with similar portfolio profiles
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for The, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A61K (Preparations FOR Medical), The ranks #211 of 7,163 assignees by patent count in that subclass.
Similar innovation score
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (61 here).
Similar claim depth
Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (16.5 here).
The's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
61 Top 3% higher than 97% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 34 | 7.1% |
| 2016 | 39 | 8.1% |
| 2017 | 63 | 13.1% |
| 2018 | 46 | 9.6% |
| 2019 | 54 | 11.3% |
| 2020 | 51 | 10.6% |
| 2021 | 45 | 9.4% |
| 2022 | 42 | 8.8% |
| 2023 | 38 | 7.9% |
| 2024 | 36 | 7.5% |
| 2025partial year | 32 | 6.7% |
Which technologies does The Penn State Research Foundation patent most?
Top 15 of 188 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
The Penn State Research Foundation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- The Penn State Research Foundation's lead technology class is A61K (Preparations FOR Medical, Dental OR Toiletry Purposes), 19.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61K
- Ranked #930 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare The Penn State Research Foundation against The Swatch Group Research and Development Ltd, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 61.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.