Where does The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma ranks #1,897 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma hold?

The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma holds 212 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 107 technology areas.

What is The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma's Innovation Score?

The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma has an Innovation Score of 61.2 out of 100 (top 3% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma focus on?

The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma's top technology area is A61K (Preparations FOR Medical, Dental OR Toiletry Purposes) with 87 patents, ranking #221 of 7,163 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 107 CPC subclasses total.

Is The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma's recent grant velocity is +12% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma's patents?

The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma's patents average 16.7 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma

Q: How is the The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 212 granted patents across 107 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61K (Preparations FOR Medical, Dental OR Toiletry Purposes).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, The ranks #1,897 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 212 patents across 107 technology areas.

#1,897
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 3%
by Innovation Score (61.2/100): 16.7
avg claims per patent: +12%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R1897 · US Corporation #1,897 · 212 grants

GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-WIDE · INNOV-STRONG · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MID 212 grants
TOP-DECILE #1,897/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Agco International
CPC-WIDE A61K · 107 areas
INNOV-STRONG 61.2/100
CLAIMS-RICH 16.7 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-UP +12% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Agco International GmbH (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How The’s 61.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 18.5 pts (30%) Velocity 7.6 pts (12%) Breadth 25.0 pts (41%) Claim depth 10.0 pts (16%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
ABL IP Holding · near

61
The Board of… · this assignee

61
University OF… · near

61
Laitram L L C · near

61
Roland · near

61
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows The's Innovation Score is 61.2/100 (top 3% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for The?

Each dot is one of The’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). The’s own 16.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

The vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

How The's grant cadence moved

Between 2020–2024, The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma received 100 grants versus 89 in 2015–2019 (+12% equal-window velocity, above median growth). Across complete PatentsView years, output peaked in 2022 at 23 grants and bottomed in 2016 at 14. Lead class A61K accounts for 41% of the portfolio across 107 subclasses. Volume neighbours: Robert Bosch Tool Corporation (#1,893) and Rosenberger Hochfrequenztechnik GmbH & Co. KG (#1,901).

The's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma moved from 55 to 63 grants (1.15x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #876. See the growth leaderboard.

Robert Bosch Tool

213
Soliton

213
nlight

213
Agco International

212
UniversitÉ D'aix-…

212
The Board of Rege… ◀

212
Airbus Helicopter…

211
GE Energy Power C…

211
Rosenberger Hochf…

211

What this shows The holds 212 patents at rank #1,897, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near The

By rank, the assignees closest to #1,897 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61K (Preparations FOR Medical)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in The's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for The, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A61K (Preparations FOR Medical), The ranks #221 of 7,163 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (61 here).

University OF Maryland, Baltimore 61 ABL IP Holding LLC 61 Roland Corporation 61 Laitram, L.L.C. 61

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (16.7 here).

Biomet Manufacturing, LLC 16.7 avg Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. 16.7 avg Texas Instruments Incorporated 16.7 avg CreateMe Technologies Inc. 16.7 avg

The's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

61 Top 3% higher than 97% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	17	8.0%
2016	14	6.6%
2017	22	10.4%
2018	18	8.5%
2019	18	8.5%
2020	17	8.0%
2021	20	9.4%
2022	23	10.8%
2023	19	9.0%
2024	21	9.9%
2025partial year	23	10.8%

Which technologies does The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma patent most?

A61K - Preparations FOR Medical, Dental OR Toiletry Purposes 87

A61P - Specific Therapeutic Activity OF Chemical Compounds OR Medicinal Preparations 50

C07K - Peptides 47

G01N - Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties 33

C12N - Microorganisms OR ENZYMES; Compositions THEREOF; Propagating, Preserving, OR Maintaining MICROORGANISMS; Mutation OR Genetic ENGINEERING; Culture Media 29

Y02A - Technologies FOR Adaptation TO Climate Change 17

C12Y - Enzymes 15

A61B - DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification 13

Y02E - Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution 12

B82Y - Specific Uses OR Applications OF NANOSTRUCTURES; Measurement OR Analysis OF NANOSTRUCTURES; Manufacture OR Treatment OF Nanostructures 12

C07D - Heterocyclic Compounds 10

A61N - ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; Radiation THERAPY; Ultrasound Therapy 10

A61L - Methods OR Apparatus FOR Sterilising Materials OR Objects IN GENERAL; Disinfection, Sterilisation OR Deodorisation OF AIR; Chemical Aspects OF Bandages, Dressings, Absorbent Pads OR Surgical ARTICLES; Materials FOR Bandages, Dressings, Absorbent Pads OR Surgical Articles 10

H10F - Inorganic Semiconductor Devices Sensitive TO Infrared Radiation, Light, Electromagnetic Radiation OF Shorter Wavelength OR Corpuscular Radiation 9

G01S - Radio DIRECTION-FINDING; Radio NAVIGATION; Determining Distance OR Velocity BY USE OF Radio WAVES; Locating OR Presence-detecting BY USE OF THE Reflection OR Reradiation OF Radio WAVES; Analogous Arrangements Using Other Waves 9

Top 15 of 107 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma's lead technology class is A61K (Preparations FOR Medical, Dental OR Toiletry Purposes), 41% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61K
Ranked #1,897 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma against Robert Bosch Tool Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 61.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.