Where does THE Arizona Board OF Regents rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), THE Arizona Board OF Regents ranks #11,831 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does THE Arizona Board OF Regents hold?

THE Arizona Board OF Regents holds 26 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2023, spanning 44 technology areas.

What is THE Arizona Board OF Regents's Innovation Score?

THE Arizona Board OF Regents has an Innovation Score of 55.7 out of 100 (top 7% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does THE Arizona Board OF Regents focus on?

THE Arizona Board OF Regents's top technology area is G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties) with 9 patents, ranking #1,627 of 7,863 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 44 CPC subclasses total.

Is THE Arizona Board OF Regents's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

THE Arizona Board OF Regents's recent grant velocity is -70% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for THE Arizona Board OF Regents's patents?

THE Arizona Board OF Regents's patents average 16.3 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the THE Arizona Board OF Regents patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

THE Arizona Board OF Regents

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 26 granted patents across 44 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, THE ranks #11,831 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 26 patents across 44 technology areas.

#11,831
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 7%
by Innovation Score (55.7/100): 16.3
avg claims per patent: -70%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R11831 · US Corporation #11,831 · 26 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-WIDE · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 26 grants
UPPER-Q #11,831/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Tatsumi Ryoki
CPC-WIDE G01N · 44 areas
INNOV-PAR 55.7/100
CLAIMS-RICH 16.3 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -70% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Tatsumi Ryoki Co., Ltd (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How THE’s 55.7 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 11.4 pts (20%) Velocity 11.1 pts (20%) Breadth 23.5 pts (42%) Claim depth 9.8 pts (18%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Caterpillar Sarl · near

56
Norton (Waterford) · near

56
Rigetti & · near

56
South Dakota Board… · near

56
THE Arizona Board… · this assignee

56
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows THE's Innovation Score is 55.7/100 (top 7% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for THE?

Each dot is one of THE’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). THE’s own 16.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.3 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

THE vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where THE's grants concentrate

THE Arizona Board OF Regents is a focused PatentsView assignee: 44 CPC subclasses with 34.6% of grants classified under G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (7 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, THE sits between Tatsumi Ryoki Co., Ltd and Tietex International, Ltd..

THE's three-year grant acceleration

THE Arizona Board OF Regents shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Tatsumi Ryoki

26
Teletech Holdings

26
Termax

26
THE Antenna Inter…

26
THE United States…

26
Thermotek

26
TI Automotive (Fu…

26
Tietex Internatio…

26
THE Arizona Board… ◀

26

What this shows THE holds 26 patents at rank #11,828, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near THE

By rank, the assignees closest to #11,828 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in THE's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for THE, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their…), THE ranks #1,627 of 7,863 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (56 here).

Norton (Waterford) Limited 56 South Dakota Board OF Regents 56 Rigetti & Co, LLC 56 Caterpillar Sarl 56

THE's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

56 Top 7% higher than 93% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

THE Arizona Board OF Regents patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	7	26.9%
2016	2	7.7%
2017	7	26.9%
2018	2	7.7%
2019	2	7.7%
2020	1	3.8%
2022	3	11.5%
2023	2	7.7%

Which technologies does THE Arizona Board OF Regents patent most?

G01N - Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties 9

A61K - Preparations FOR Medical, Dental OR Toiletry Purposes 6

A61P - Specific Therapeutic Activity OF Chemical Compounds OR Medicinal Preparations 5

C12N - Microorganisms OR ENZYMES; Compositions THEREOF; Propagating, Preserving, OR Maintaining MICROORGANISMS; Mutation OR Genetic ENGINEERING; Culture Media 3

Y02A - Technologies FOR Adaptation TO Climate Change 3

A61B - DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification 3

H10D - Inorganic Electric Semiconductor Devices 3

C09K - Materials FOR Miscellaneous Applications, NOT Provided FOR Elsewhere 3

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 2

G16H - Healthcare Informatics, i.e. Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR THE Handling OR Processing OF Medical OR Healthcare Data 2

C01P - Indexing Scheme Relating TO Structural AND Physical Aspects OF Solid Inorganic Compounds 2

C01G - Compounds Containing Metals NOT Covered BY Subclasses C01d OR C01f 2

H01B - CABLES; CONDUCTORS; INSULATORS; Selection OF Materials FOR Their Conductive, Insulating OR Dielectric Properties 2

C01B - Non-metallic ELEMENTS; Compounds THEREOF; ; Metalloids OR Compounds Thereof NOT Covered BY Subclass C01c 2

B82Y - Specific Uses OR Applications OF NANOSTRUCTURES; Measurement OR Analysis OF NANOSTRUCTURES; Manufacture OR Treatment OF Nanostructures 2

Top 15 of 44 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

THE Arizona Board OF Regents's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

THE Arizona Board OF Regents's lead technology class is G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties), 34.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G01N
Ranked #11,831 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare THE Arizona Board OF Regents against Tatsumi Ryoki Co., Ltd, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 55.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.