Where does Stop River Development LLC rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Stop River Development LLC ranks #43,343 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Stop River Development LLC hold?

Stop River Development LLC holds 6 US utility patents granted between 2020 and 2023, spanning 4 technology areas.

What is Stop River Development LLC's Innovation Score?

Stop River Development LLC has an Innovation Score of 28.9 out of 100 (29th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Stop River Development LLC focus on?

Stop River Development LLC's top technology area is A63C (SKATES; SKIS; Roller SKATES; Design OR Layout OF Courts, Rinks OR THE Like) with 6 patents, ranking #20 of 125 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 4 CPC subclasses total.

Is Stop River Development LLC's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Stop River Development LLC.

What does claim depth mean for Stop River Development LLC's patents?

Stop River Development LLC's patents average 19.7 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Stop River Development LLC patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Stop River Development LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63C (SKATES; SKIS; Roller SKATES; Design OR Layout OF Courts, Rinks OR THE Like).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Stop ranks #43,343 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 4 technology areas.

#43,343
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 29th percentile
by Innovation Score (28.9/100): 19.7
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R43343 · US Corporation #43,343 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
LOWER-Q #43,343/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Stephen F Austin…
CPC-NARROW A63C · 4 areas
INNOV-THIN 28.9/100
CLAIMS-RICH 19.7 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
SPAN-YRS 2020–2023 · 4y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Stephen F. Austin State University (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Stop’s 28.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.7 pts (23%) Velocity 3.3 pts (11%) Breadth 7.1 pts (25%) Claim depth 11.8 pts (41%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Stop River Development · this assignee

29
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Stop's Innovation Score is 28.9/100 (29th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Stop?

Each dot is one of Stop’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Stop’s own 19.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Stop vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Stop's grants concentrate

Stop River Development LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A63C (SKATES; SKIS; Roller SKATES; Design OR Layout OF Courts, Rinks OR THE Like). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Stop sits between Stephen F. Austin State University and Strasbaugh.

Stop's three-year grant acceleration

Stop River Development LLC shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Stephen F Austin…

6
Stereo Display

6
Stichting Vumc

6
Stimdia Medical

6
Stoplight

6
Storageos

6
Strahman Valves

6
Strasbaugh

6
Stop River Develo… ◀

6

What this shows Stop holds 6 patents at rank #43,368, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Stop

By rank, the assignees closest to #43,368 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A63C (Skates)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Stop's primary technology class.

Stop's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

29 29th percentile higher than 29% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2020–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Stop River Development LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2020	1	16.7%
2021	3	50.0%
2023	2	33.3%

Which technologies does Stop River Development LLC patent most?

A63C - SKATES; SKIS; Roller SKATES; Design OR Layout OF Courts, Rinks OR THE Like 6

A43B - Characteristic Features OF FOOTWEAR; Parts OF Footwear 4

H01F - MAGNETS; INDUCTANCES; TRANSFORMERS; Selection OF Materials FOR Their Magnetic Properties 3

F42B - Explosive Charges, e.g. FOR Blasting, Fireworks, Ammunition 1

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Stop River Development LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Stop River Development LLC's lead technology class is A63C (SKATES; SKIS; Roller SKATES; Design OR Layout OF Courts, Rinks OR THE Like), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63C
Ranked #43,343 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Stop River Development LLC against Stephen F. Austin State University, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 28.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.