ST Engineering Aerospace Ltd
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 13 granted patents across 9 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B64C (AEROPLANES; Helicopters).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, ST ranks #21,825 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 13 patents across 9 technology areas.
- #21,825
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 48%
- by Innovation Score (35.9/100)
- 17.6
- avg claims per patent
- +350%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R21825 · Foreign Corporation #21,825 · 13 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 13 grants
- MID-PACK #21,825/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Spinalcyte
- CPC-NARROW B64C · 9 areas
- INNOV-THIN 35.9/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 17.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-SURGE +350% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Spinalcyte, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How ST’s 35.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around ST
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- ST Engineering… · this assignee
ST Engineering… · this assignee
36 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows ST's Innovation Score is 35.9/100 (top 48% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for ST?
Each dot is one of ST’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). ST’s own 17.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where ST's grants concentrate
ST Engineering Aerospace Ltd is a focused PatentsView assignee: 9 CPC subclasses with 46.2% of grants classified under B64C (AEROPLANES; Helicopters). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, ST sits between Spinalcyte, LLC and Starkeys LLC.
ST's three-year grant acceleration
ST Engineering Aerospace Ltd shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 6 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at ST's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Spinalcyte
Spinalcyte, LLC
13 patents
- Sportpet Designs
Sportpet Designs, Inc.
13 patents
- SRX Cardio
SRX Cardio, LLC
13 patents
- SSG International
SSG International, LLC
13 patents
- ST Jude Medical L…
ST. Jude Medical Luxembourg Holdings II S.A.R.L. (“SJM LUX II”)
13 patents
- Stamicarbon B V A…
Stamicarbon B.V. Acting Under THE Name OF MT Innovation Center
13 patents
- Staples THE Offic…
Staples THE Office Superstore, LLC
13 patents
- Starkeys
Starkeys LLC
13 patents
- ST Engineering Ae… ◀
ST Engineering Aerospace Ltd
13 patents
What this shows ST holds 13 patents at rank #21,760, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near ST
By rank, the assignees closest to #21,760 in granted patent volume.
- Spinalcyte, LLC #21,756 · 13 patents
- Sportpet Designs, Inc. #21,757 · 13 patents
- SRX Cardio, LLC #21,758 · 13 patents
- SSG International, LLC #21,759 · 13 patents
- ST. Jude Medical Luxembourg Holdings II S.A.R.L. (“SJM LUX II”) #21,761 · 13 patents
- Stamicarbon B.V. Acting Under THE Name OF MT Innovation Center #21,762 · 13 patents
- Staples THE Office Superstore, LLC #21,763 · 13 patents
- Starkeys LLC #21,764 · 13 patents
Leaders in B64C (Aeroplanes)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in ST's primary technology class.
ST's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
36 Top 48% higher than 52% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2 | 15.4% |
| 2020 | 3 | 23.1% |
| 2021 | 1 | 7.7% |
| 2022 | 3 | 23.1% |
| 2023 | 1 | 7.7% |
| 2024 | 1 | 7.7% |
| 2025partial year | 2 | 15.4% |
Which technologies does ST Engineering Aerospace Ltd patent most?
Top 9 of 9 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
ST Engineering Aerospace Ltd's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- ST Engineering Aerospace Ltd's lead technology class is B64C (AEROPLANES; Helicopters), 46.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B64C
- Ranked #21,825 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare ST Engineering Aerospace Ltd against Spinalcyte, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 35.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.