Overall rank by patents
#8,113
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 40 granted patents across 23 technology areas, active 2015–2023. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: C30B (SINGLE-CRYSTAL GROWTH ; UNIDIRECTIONAL SOLIDIFICATION OF EUTECTIC MATERIAL OR UNIDIRECTIONAL DEMIXING OF EUTECTOID MATERIAL; REFINING BY ZONE-MELTING OF MATERIAL ; PRODUCTION OF A HOMOGENEOUS POLYCRYS).
The verdict
Sixpoint holds 40 US patents across 23 technology areas, rank #8,113 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Sixpoint Materials, Inc. has been granted 40 US utility patents between 2015 and 2023, placing Sixpoint Materials, Inc. at rank #8,113 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 23 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 17.8 claims per patent with primary concentration in C30B (SINGLE-CRYSTAL GROWTH ; UNIDIRECTIONAL SOLIDIFICATION OF EUTECTIC MATERIAL OR UNIDIRECTIONAL DEMIXING OF EUTECTOID MATERIAL; REFINING BY ZONE-MELTING OF MATERIAL ; PRODUCTION OF A HOMOGENEOUS POLYCRYS). As a US Corporation, Sixpoint Materials, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Sixpoint sits between Scandit Ag (40 patents, rank #8,109) and Storebound Llc (40 patents, rank #8,117) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 43.1/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 2 grants, compared with 38 in the 2015–2019 window, a -95% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Sixpoint Materials, Inc.'s 17.8 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while a multi-domain presence across 23 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Sixpoint Materials, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Scandit AG
40 patents
Segway Technology Co., Ltd.
40 patents
Silgan Plastics LLC
40 patents
Silixa Ltd.
40 patents
Skyhigh Networks, LLC
40 patents
Somerset Therapeutics, LLC
40 patents
Somos, Inc.
40 patents
StoreBound LLC
40 patents
SixPoint Materials, Inc.
40 patents
What this shows Sixpoint holds 40 patents at rank #8,113, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #8,113 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Sixpoint's primary technology class.
Sixpoint's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
43 Top 29% higher than 71% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 | 7.5% |
| 2016 | 9 | 22.5% |
| 2017 | 11 | 27.5% |
| 2018 | 10 | 25.0% |
| 2019 | 5 | 12.5% |
| 2023 | 2 | 5.0% |
Top 15 of 23 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#8,113
Across all tracked assignees
43.1 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Sixpoint's 40 grants land it in the top 29% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.