USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Redzone Robotics, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 27 granted patents across 27 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16L (PIPES; JOINTS OR FITTINGS FOR PIPES; SUPPORTS FOR PIPES, CABLES OR PROTECTIVE TUBING; MEANS FOR THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL).

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

Total patents granted

CPC technology areas

15.6

Avg claims per patent

+45%

5-year grant velocity

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Redzone ranks #11,406 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 27 patents across 27 technology areas.

#11,406
of 50,000 US assignees by volume: Top 29%
by Innovation Score (43.1/100): 15.6
avg claims per patent: +45%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

Portfolio overview

Redzone Robotics, Inc. has been granted 27 US utility patents between 2015 and 2024, placing Redzone Robotics, Inc. at #11,406 of 50,000 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 27 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 15.6 claims per patent with primary concentration in F16L (PIPES; JOINTS OR FITTINGS FOR PIPES; SUPPORTS FOR PIPES, CABLES OR PROTECTIVE TUBING; MEANS FOR THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL). As a US Corporation, Redzone Robotics, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Redzone sits between Racepoint Energy, Llc (27 patents, rank #11,408) and Sakti3, Inc. (27 patents, rank #11,416) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 43.1/100 blends portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Grant cadence records the difference between two grant-year windows. Between 2020 and 2024 the company received 16 grants, compared with 11 in the 2015–2019 window, a +45% shift in five-year grant velocity. Both windows cover five complete grant years; the latest PatentsView year is a partial release and is excluded from this comparison, though it still appears in the yearly table and chart below. Grant timing can lag the related application by years, so this comparison does not establish current R&D spending, strategic intent, or a company’s application activity. The US Corporation classification provides context for the assignee record, not a conclusion about its business strategy.

Claim depth and technology breadth describe this aggregate record. Redzone Robotics, Inc.'s 15.6 average claims per patent is an average count, not a measure of claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk. The record spans 27 CPC subclasses. Combined with portfolio volume, these figures let readers compare the documented grant records of assignees in similar technology classes.

Racepoint Energy

27
Rapt IP

27
Realsee (Beijing)…

27
Recurium IP Holdi…

27
Redpine Signals

27
Reflect Scientific

27
Safoco

27
Sakti3

27
Redzone Robotics ◀

27

What this shows Redzone holds 27 patents at rank #11,412, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Redzone

By rank, the assignees closest to #11,412 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F16L (Pipes)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Redzone's primary technology class.

Redzone's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

43 Top 29% higher than 71% of 50,000 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Redzone Robotics, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	2	7.4%
2016	1	3.7%
2017	2	7.4%
2018	3	11.1%
2019	3	11.1%
2020	3	11.1%
2021	6	22.2%
2023	2	7.4%
2024	5	18.5%

Which technologies does Redzone Robotics, Inc. patent most?

F16L - PIPES; JOINTS OR FITTINGS FOR PIPES; SUPPORTS FOR PIPES, CABLES OR PROTECTIVE TUBING; MEANS FOR THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL 14

G01N - INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES 13

G06T - IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL 11

G01S - RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES 9

Y10S - TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS 7

G06Q - INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR 7

H04N - PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION 7

G06F - ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING 7

G01M - TESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR 6

B23K - SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM 4

Y02W - CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR WASTE MANAGEMENT 4

G01B - MEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS 4

G05D - SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES 4

E03F - SEWERS; CESSPOOLS 3

G02B - OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS 2

Top 15 of 27 technology areas

Grant record at a glance

Portfolio Volume 27 grants

CPC subclasses 27

Avg. claims / grant 15.6

Velocity +45%

Historical grant data only; it does not rate legal strength or current strategy.

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#11,406

of 50,000 tracked assignees

Innovation Score

43.1 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does Redzone Robotics, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Redzone Robotics, Inc. ranks #11,406 of 50,000 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Redzone Robotics, Inc. hold?

Redzone Robotics, Inc. holds 27 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2024, spanning 27 technology areas.

What is Redzone Robotics, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Redzone Robotics, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 43.1 out of 100 (top 29% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Redzone Robotics, Inc. focus on?

Redzone Robotics, Inc.'s top technology area is F16L (PIPES; JOINTS OR FITTINGS FOR PIPES; SUPPORTS FOR PIPES, CABLES OR PROTECTIVE TUBING; MEANS FOR THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL) with 14 patents. Grants appear in 27 CPC subclasses total.

Is Redzone Robotics, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Redzone Robotics, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +45% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for Redzone Robotics, Inc.'s patents?

Redzone Robotics, Inc.'s patents average 15.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Redzone Robotics, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

How to use this portfolio

Redzone's 27 grants land it in the top 29% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - Redzone ranks #11,406 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
Most of this portfolio concentrates in F16L - see who else leads that technology area. F16L leaders
Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.