Where does Sinmat, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Sinmat, Inc. ranks #37,559 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Sinmat, Inc. hold?

Sinmat, Inc. holds 7 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2018, spanning 10 technology areas.

What is Sinmat, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Sinmat, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 24.4 out of 100 (14th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Sinmat, Inc. focus on?

Sinmat, Inc.'s top technology area is C09G (Polishing Compositions ; SKI Waxes) with 6 patents, ranking #17 of 48 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 10 CPC subclasses total.

Is Sinmat, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Sinmat, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Sinmat, Inc.'s patents?

Sinmat, Inc.'s patents average 10.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Sinmat, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Sinmat, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 10 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C09G (Polishing Compositions ; SKI Waxes).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Sinmat ranks #37,559 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 10 technology areas.

#37,559
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 14th percentile
by Innovation Score (24.4/100): 10.0
avg claims per patent: -100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R37559 · US Corporation #37,559 · 7 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
LOWER-Q #37,559/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Silver Defender
CPC-FOCUS C09G · 10 areas
INNOV-THIN 24.4/100
CLAIMS-PAR 10.0 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Silver Defender Corp (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Sinmat’s 24.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.2 pts (30%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 11.2 pts (46%) Claim depth 6.0 pts (25%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Sinmat · this assignee

24
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Sinmat's Innovation Score is 24.4/100 (14th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Sinmat?

Each dot is one of Sinmat’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Sinmat’s own 10.0 claims/patent is at or below the 11.3 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Sinmat vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Sinmat's grants concentrate

Sinmat, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 10 CPC subclasses with 85.7% of grants classified under C09G (Polishing Compositions ; SKI Waxes). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Sinmat sits between Silver Defender Corp and Sitzmann Tools, LLC.

Silver Defender

7
Silveredge Pvt

7
Sima Patent ve Li…

7
Singular Bio

7
Sioux City Tarp

7
Sire Spirits

7
Sirona Dental

7
Sitzmann Tools

7
Sinmat ◀

7

What this shows Sinmat holds 7 patents at rank #37,644, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Sinmat

By rank, the assignees closest to #37,644 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C09G (Polishing Compositions)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Sinmat's primary technology class.

Sinmat's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

24 14th percentile higher than 14% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2018

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Sinmat, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	14.3%
2016	3	42.9%
2017	2	28.6%
2018	1	14.3%

Which technologies does Sinmat, Inc. patent most?

C09G - Polishing Compositions ; SKI Waxes 6

B24B - Machines, Devices, OR Processes FOR Grinding OR Polishing ; Dressing OR Conditioning OF Abrading SURFACES; Feeding OF Grinding, Polishing, OR Lapping Agents 5

H01L - Semiconductor Devices NOT Covered BY Class H10 5

C09K - Materials FOR Miscellaneous Applications, NOT Provided FOR Elsewhere 4

C30B - Single-crystal Growth ; Unidirectional Solidification OF Eutectic Material OR Unidirectional Demixing OF Eutectoid MATERIAL; Refining BY Zone-melting OF Material ; Production OF A Homogeneous Polycrystalline Material With Defined Structure ; Single Crystals OR Homogeneous Polycrystalline Material WI 4

H10D - Inorganic Electric Semiconductor Devices 3

C23F - Non-mechanical Removal OF Metallic Material From Surface ; Inhibiting Corrosion OF Metallic Material OR Incrustation IN GENERAL; Multi-step Processes FOR Surface Treatment OF Metallic Material Involving AT Least ONE Process Provided FOR IN Class C23 AND AT Least ONE Process Covered BY Subclass C21d 3

B32B - Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form 2

B28D - Working Stone OR Stone-like Materials 2

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 2

Top 10 of 10 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Sinmat, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Sinmat, Inc.'s lead technology class is C09G (Polishing Compositions ; SKI Waxes), 85.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C09G
Ranked #37,559 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Sinmat, Inc. against Silver Defender Corp, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 24.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.