Where does Shock Doctor, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Shock Doctor, Inc. ranks #5,322 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Shock Doctor, Inc. hold?

Shock Doctor, Inc. holds 65 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2024, spanning 7 technology areas.

What is Shock Doctor, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Shock Doctor, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 30.9 out of 100 (36th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Shock Doctor, Inc. focus on?

Shock Doctor, Inc.'s top technology area is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment) with 13 patents, ranking #93 of 1,021 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 7 CPC subclasses total.

Is Shock Doctor, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Shock Doctor, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -24% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Shock Doctor, Inc.'s patents?

Shock Doctor, Inc.'s patents average 5.7 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Shock Doctor, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Shock Doctor, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 65 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Shock ranks #5,322 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 65 patents across 7 technology areas.

#5,322
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 36th percentile
by Innovation Score (30.9/100): 5.7
avg claims per patent: -24%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R5322 · US Corporation #5,322 · 65 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 65 grants
UPPER-Q #5,322/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Schneider Toshiba…
CPC-NARROW A63B · 7 areas
INNOV-THIN 30.9/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 5.7 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DOWN -24% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Schneider Toshiba Inverter Europe SAS (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Shock’s 30.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 14.5 pts (47%) Velocity 3.7 pts (12%) Breadth 9.4 pts (30%) Claim depth 3.4 pts (11%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Elcelyx Therapeutics · near

31
Shock Doctor · this assignee

31
Casepoint · near

31
Guardtime · near

31
Ioniqa B V · near

31
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Shock's Innovation Score is 30.9/100 (36th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Shock?

Each dot is one of Shock’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Shock’s own 5.7 claims/patent is at or below the 15.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Shock vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Shock's grants concentrate

Shock Doctor, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 20% of grants classified under A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (14 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2024. By volume, Shock sits between SPR Therapeutics, Inc. and Swarovski-Optik AG & Co KG..

Shock's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Shock Doctor, Inc. moved from 27 to 15 grants (0.56x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). See the growth leaderboard.

SPR Therapeutics

65
Schneider Toshiba…

65
Seven Bridges Gen…

65
Shenzhen Grandsun

65
Sonic IP

65
Subsea 7

65
Suphatchatwong In…

65
Swarovski-optik &…

65
Shock Doctor ◀

65

What this shows Shock holds 65 patents at rank #5,322, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Shock

By rank, the assignees closest to #5,322 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Shock's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Shock, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training), Shock ranks #93 of 1,021 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (31 here).

Elcelyx Therapeutics, Inc. 31 Guardtime SA 31 Ioniqa Technologies B.V. 31 Casepoint, LLC 31

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (5.7 here).

Omix-ada, Inc. 5.7 avg Hino Motors, Ltd. 5.7 avg Beijing University OF Technology 5.6 avg Iseki & Co., Ltd. 5.7 avg

Shock's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

31 36th percentile higher than 36% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Shock Doctor, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	3	4.6%
2016	4	6.2%
2017	7	10.8%
2018	9	13.8%
2019	14	21.5%
2020	6	9.2%
2021	7	10.8%
2022	5	7.7%
2023	8	12.3%
2024	2	3.1%

Which technologies does Shock Doctor, Inc. patent most?

A63B - Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment 13

A41D - OUTERWEAR; Protective GARMENTS; Accessories 9

A41B - SHIRTS; UNDERWEAR; Baby LINEN; Handkerchiefs 7

A61F - Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive DEVICES; FOMENTATION; Treatment OR Protection OF Eyes OR EARS; Bandages, Dressings OR Absorbent PADS; Firs 7

A45F - Travelling OR Camp EQUIPMENT: Sacks OR Packs Carried ON THE Body 2

A61M - Devices FOR Introducing Media Into, OR Onto, THE Body ; Devices FOR Transducing Body Media OR FOR Taking Media From THE Body ; Devices FOR Producing OR Ending Sleep OR Stupor 1

A61C - DENTISTRY; Apparatus OR Methods FOR Oral OR Dental Hygiene 1

Top 7 of 7 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Shock Doctor, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Shock Doctor, Inc.'s lead technology class is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment), 20% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63B
Ranked #5,322 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Shock Doctor, Inc. against SPR Therapeutics, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 30.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.