Ridetones, Inc
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G10L (Speech Analysis Techniques OR Speech SYNTHESIS; Speech RECOGNITION; Speech OR Voice Processing TECHNIQUES; Speech OR Audio Coding OR Decoding).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Ridetones ranks #49,993 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 5 technology areas.
- #49,993
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 12th percentile
- by Innovation Score (23.3/100)
- 15.4
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R49993 · Foreign Corporation #49,993 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #49,993/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Rhombus Holdings
- CPC-NARROW G10L · 5 areas
- INNOV-THIN 23.3/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 15.4 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Rhombus Holdings LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Ridetones’s 23.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Ridetones
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Ridetones · this assignee 23
Ridetones · this assignee
23 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Ridetones's Innovation Score is 23.3/100 (12th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Ridetones?
Each dot is one of Ridetones’s 6 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Ridetones’s own 15.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Ridetones's grants concentrate
Ridetones, Inc is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 60% of grants classified under G10L (Speech Analysis Techniques OR Speech SYNTHESIS; Speech RECOGNITION; Speech OR Voice Processing TECHNIQUES; Speech OR Audio Coding OR Decoding). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (3 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2017. By volume, Ridetones sits between Rhombus Holdings LLC and Riidea International Corp..
Who files at Ridetones's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Rhombus Holdings
Rhombus Holdings LLC
5 patents
- Richard Campey
Richard Campey Limited
5 patents
- Richard Ward Cout…
Richard Ward Couture Styling Ltd.
5 patents
- Richell
Richell Corporation
5 patents
- Rigaku Innovative
Rigaku Innovative Technologies, Inc.
5 patents
- Riidea Internatio…
Riidea International Corp.
5 patents
- Ridetones ◀
Ridetones, Inc
5 patents
What this shows Ridetones holds 5 patents at rank #49,998, shown against the 6 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Ridetones
By rank, the assignees closest to #49,998 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in G10L (Speech Analysis Techniques OR Speech Synthesis)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Ridetones's primary technology class.
- Google LLC 2,230 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 1,661 in class
- International Business Machines Corporation 1,520 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 897 in class
- Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. 760 in class
- Apple Inc. 705 in class
- Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation 680 in class
- Dolby International AB 641 in class
Ridetones's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
23 12th percentile higher than 12% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2018 | 3 | 60.0% |
Which technologies does Ridetones, Inc patent most?
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Ridetones, Inc's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Ridetones, Inc's lead technology class is G10L (Speech Analysis Techniques OR Speech SYNTHESIS; Speech RECOGNITION; Speech OR Voice Processing TECHNIQUES; Speech OR Audio Coding OR Decoding), 60% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G10L
- Ranked #49,993 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Ridetones, Inc against Rhombus Holdings LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 23.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.