Richard Campey Limited
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A01B (Soil Working IN Agriculture OR FORESTRY; Parts, Details, OR Accessories OF Agricultural Machines OR Implements, IN General).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Richard ranks #49,990 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 2 technology areas.
- #49,990
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 5th percentile
- by Innovation Score (18.6/100)
- 12.4
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R49990 · Foreign Corporation #49,990 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #49,990/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Rheia
- CPC-NARROW A01B · 2 areas
- INNOV-LOW 18.6/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 12.4 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Rheia, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Richard’s 18.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Richard
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Richard Campey · this assignee 19
Richard Campey · this assignee
19 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Richard's Innovation Score is 18.6/100 (5th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Richard?
Each dot is one of Richard’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Richard’s own 12.4 claims/patent is at or below the 15.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Richard's grants concentrate
Richard Campey Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A01B (Soil Working IN Agriculture OR FORESTRY; Parts, Details, OR Accessories OF Agricultural Machines OR Implements, IN General). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Richard sits between Rheia, LLC and Rigaku Innovative Technologies, Inc..
Who files at Richard's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Rheia
Rheia, LLC
5 patents
- Rhino Tool
Rhino Tool Company
5 patents
- Rhode & Schwarz &…
Rhode & Schwarz GMBH & Co. KG
5 patents
- Rhombus Holdings
Rhombus Holdings LLC
5 patents
- Richard Ward Cout…
Richard Ward Couture Styling Ltd.
5 patents
- Richell
Richell Corporation
5 patents
- Ridetones
Ridetones, Inc
5 patents
- Rigaku Innovative
Rigaku Innovative Technologies, Inc.
5 patents
- Richard Campey ◀
Richard Campey Limited
5 patents
What this shows Richard holds 5 patents at rank #49,995, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Richard
By rank, the assignees closest to #49,995 in granted patent volume.
- Rheia, LLC #49,991 · 5 patents
- Rhino Tool Company #49,992 · 5 patents
- Rhode & Schwarz GMBH & Co. KG #49,993 · 5 patents
- Rhombus Holdings LLC #49,994 · 5 patents
- Richard Ward Couture Styling Ltd. #49,996 · 5 patents
- Richell Corporation #49,997 · 5 patents
- Ridetones, Inc #49,998 · 5 patents
- Rigaku Innovative Technologies, Inc. #49,999 · 5 patents
Leaders in A01B (Soil Working IN Agriculture OR Forestry)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Richard's primary technology class.
Richard's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
19 5th percentile higher than 5% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2019 | 2 | 40.0% |
Which technologies does Richard Campey Limited patent most?
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Richard Campey Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Richard Campey Limited's lead technology class is A01B (Soil Working IN Agriculture OR FORESTRY; Parts, Details, OR Accessories OF Agricultural Machines OR Implements, IN General), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A01B
- Ranked #49,990 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Richard Campey Limited against Rheia, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 18.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.