Rhombus Holdings LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G01T (Measurement OF Nuclear OR X-radiation).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Rhombus ranks #49,989 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 8 technology areas.
- #49,989
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 31st percentile
- by Innovation Score (29.4/100)
- 22.0
- avg claims per patent
- +50%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R49989 · US Corporation #49,989 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #49,989/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Rfph
- CPC-NARROW G01T · 8 areas
- INNOV-THIN 29.4/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 22.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +50% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Rfph, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Rhombus’s 29.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Rhombus
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Rhombus Holdings · this assignee 29
Rhombus Holdings · this assignee
29 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Rhombus's Innovation Score is 29.4/100 (31st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Rhombus?
Each dot is one of Rhombus’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Rhombus’s own 22.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 5.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Rhombus's grants concentrate
Rhombus Holdings LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G01T (Measurement OF Nuclear OR X-radiation). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Rhombus sits between Rfph, LLC and Ridetones, Inc.
Who files at Rhombus's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Rfph
Rfph, LLC
5 patents
- Rheia
Rheia, LLC
5 patents
- Rhino Tool
Rhino Tool Company
5 patents
- Rhode & Schwarz &…
Rhode & Schwarz GMBH & Co. KG
5 patents
- Richard Campey
Richard Campey Limited
5 patents
- Richard Ward Cout…
Richard Ward Couture Styling Ltd.
5 patents
- Richell
Richell Corporation
5 patents
- Ridetones
Ridetones, Inc
5 patents
- Rhombus Holdings ◀
Rhombus Holdings LLC
5 patents
What this shows Rhombus holds 5 patents at rank #49,994, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Rhombus
By rank, the assignees closest to #49,994 in granted patent volume.
- Rfph, LLC #49,990 · 5 patents
- Rheia, LLC #49,991 · 5 patents
- Rhino Tool Company #49,992 · 5 patents
- Rhode & Schwarz GMBH & Co. KG #49,993 · 5 patents
- Richard Campey Limited #49,995 · 5 patents
- Richard Ward Couture Styling Ltd. #49,996 · 5 patents
- Richell Corporation #49,997 · 5 patents
- Ridetones, Inc #49,998 · 5 patents
Leaders in G01T (Measurement OF Nuclear OR X-radiation)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Rhombus's primary technology class.
- Koniniklijke Philips N.V. 259 in class
- Hamamatsu Photonics K.K. 131 in class
- Shenzhen Xpectvision Technology Co., Ltd. 130 in class
- Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. 111 in class
- Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation 103 in class
- Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd. 93 in class
- Canon Medical Systems Corporation 91 in class
- Konica Minolta, Inc. 72 in class
Rhombus's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
29 31st percentile higher than 31% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2020 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2021 | 2 | 40.0% |
Which technologies does Rhombus Holdings LLC patent most?
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Rhombus Holdings LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Rhombus Holdings LLC's lead technology class is G01T (Measurement OF Nuclear OR X-radiation), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G01T
- Ranked #49,989 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Rhombus Holdings LLC against Rfph, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 29.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.