PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Rehabilitation Institute Of Chicago

USPTO PatentsView assignee record — 63 granted patents across 21 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A61F (FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE).

Explore the portfolio See the ranking
63
Total patents granted
21
CPC technology areas
17.5
Avg claims per patent
-25%
5-year filing velocity

The verdict

Rehabilitation holds 63 US patents across 21 technology areas — rank #5,464 of 50,000 tracked assignees.

#5,464
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 27%
by Innovation Score (43.9/100)
17.5
avg claims per patent
-25%
filing velocity, last 5 yrs

Portfolio overview

Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago has been granted 63 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago at rank #5,464 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 21 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 17.5 claims per patent with primary concentration in A61F (FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE). As a US Corporation, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. The composite Innovation Score of 43.9/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 27 grants, compared with 36 in the 2015–2019 window — a -25% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.

Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago's 17.5 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while a multi-domain presence across 21 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago against peers pursuing similar technology classes.

How does Rehabilitation compare?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus the largest corporate holders — this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Rehabilitation holds 63 patents — placing it at rank #5,464 overall, well behind the volume leaders but ahead of the tens of thousands of smaller assignees in the dataset.

Source USPTO PatentsView — granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Rehabilitation's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

44 Top 27% higher than 73% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). Below this entry. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). Below this entry. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). This entry sits in this band. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). Above this entry. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView — PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

05101520 20152016201720182019202020212022202320242025 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 1 1.6%
2016 1 1.6%
2017 11 17.5%
2018 5 7.9%
2019 18 28.6%
2020 9 14.3%
2021 4 6.3%
2022 6 9.5%
2023 3 4.8%
2024 4 6.3%
2025 1 1.6%

Which technologies does Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago patent most?

Top 15 of 21 technology areas

Patent Moat Analysis

Portfolio Volume Light
Tech Breadth Multi-domain
Claim Depth Standard
Velocity Declining

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#5,464

Across all tracked assignees

Innovation Score

43.9 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView — US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

How many patents does Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago hold?
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago holds 63 US granted patents filed between 2015 and 2025, spanning 21 technology areas.
What is Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago's Innovation Score?
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago has an Innovation Score of 43.9 out of 100. This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), filing velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago focus on?
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago's top technology area is A61F (FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRS) with 32 patents. The company has filed patents in 21 CPC subclasses total.
Is Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago's patent filing rate increasing or decreasing?
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago's recent filing velocity is -25% compared to the prior five-year period. Filing activity has slowed relative to earlier years.
What does claim depth mean for Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago's patents?
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago's patents average 17.5 claims each. This falls within the standard range, providing solid legal coverage.
How is the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

Learn More

How Innovation Score Works

Understand the four dimensions behind the composite score
How to Read Patent Data

Plain-English guide to CPC codes, claims, and metrics
Patent Moat Analysis

How companies use patents as competitive barriers

How to use this portfolio

Rehabilitation's 63 grants land it in the top 27% by Innovation Score — but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance — Rehabilitation ranks #5,464 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in A61F — see who else leads that technology area. A61F leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity — not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Explore the patent dataset

A61F technology

Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago's primary CPC class — all holders and yearly trends
Top 50 patent holders

See where Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago ranks among the largest US patent assignees
All technology classes

Browse every CPC technology area by patent activity
How the score works

The four dimensions behind the Innovation Score

Related

All companies → | All technologies → | Rankings →
Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView — official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView — the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) — the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search — the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov