Where does Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago ranks #5,463 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago hold?

Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago holds 63 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 21 technology areas.

What is Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago's Innovation Score?

Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago has an Innovation Score of 43.9 out of 100 (top 27% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago's recent grant velocity is -28% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago's patents?

Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago's patents average 17.5 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago

Q: What technology areas does Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago focus on?

Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago's top technology area is A61F (Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive DEVICES; FOMENTATION; Treatment OR Protection OF Eyes OR EARS; Bandages, Dressings OR Absorbent PADS; Firs) with 32 patents, ranking #197 of 3,082 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 21 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 63 granted patents across 21 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61F (Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive Device).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Rehabilitation ranks #5,463 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 63 patents across 21 technology areas.

#5,463
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 27%
by Innovation Score (43.9/100): 17.5
avg claims per patent: -28%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R5463 · US Corporation #5,463 · 63 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 63 grants
UPPER-Q #5,463/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Plexxikon
CPC-FOCUS A61F · 21 areas
INNOV-PAR 43.9/100
CLAIMS-RICH 17.5 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DOWN -28% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Plexxikon Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Rehabilitation’s 43.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 14.4 pts (33%) Velocity 2.8 pts (6%) Breadth 16.2 pts (37%) Claim depth 10.5 pts (24%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Coulter Ventures · near

44
PME IP PTY · near

44
Qingdao Haier Joint… · near

44
Rehabilitation… · this assignee

44
Sorrento Therapeutics · near

44
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Rehabilitation's Innovation Score is 43.9/100 (top 27% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Rehabilitation?

Each dot is one of Rehabilitation’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Rehabilitation’s own 17.5 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.5 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Rehabilitation vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Rehabilitation's grants concentrate

Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago is a focused PatentsView assignee: 21 CPC subclasses with 50.8% of grants classified under A61F (Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive Device). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (18 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Rehabilitation sits between Plexxikon Inc. and SK Global Chemical Co., Ltd..

Rehabilitation's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago moved from 31 to 13 grants (0.42x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). See the growth leaderboard.

Plexxikon

63
Purewick

63
R A Brands L L C

63
Rockspoon

63
Robert Bosch Auto…

63
Shanghai Universi…

63
Shenzhen Eigate T…

63
SK Global Chemical

63
Rehabilitation In… ◀

63

What this shows Rehabilitation holds 63 patents at rank #5,464, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Rehabilitation

By rank, the assignees closest to #5,464 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61F (Filters Implantable Into Blood Vessels)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Rehabilitation's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Rehabilitation, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A61F (Filters Implantable Into Blood Vessels), Rehabilitation ranks #197 of 3,082 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (44 here).

PME IP PTY Ltd 44 Qingdao Haier Joint Stock Co., Ltd. 44 Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc. 44 Coulter Ventures, LLC. 44

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (17.5 here).

VÄLINGE Innovation AB 17.5 avg Toray Plastics (America), Inc. 17.5 avg Verint Americas Inc. 17.5 avg Meta Platforms, Inc. 17.5 avg

Rehabilitation's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

44 Top 27% higher than 73% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	1.6%
2016	1	1.6%
2017	11	17.5%
2018	5	7.9%
2019	18	28.6%
2020	9	14.3%
2021	4	6.3%
2022	6	9.5%
2023	3	4.8%
2024	4	6.3%
2025partial year	1	1.6%

Which technologies does Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago patent most?

A61F - Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive DEVICES; FOMENTATION; Treatment OR Protection OF Eyes OR EARS; Bandages, Dressings OR Absorbent PADS; Firs 32

A61B - DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification 19

B25J - MANIPULATORS; Chambers Provided With Manipulation Devices 7

G16H - Healthcare Informatics, i.e. Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR THE Handling OR Processing OF Medical OR Healthcare Data 7

A61H - Physical Therapy Apparatus, e.g. Devices FOR Locating OR Stimulating Reflex Points IN THE BODY; Artificial RESPIRATION; MASSAGE; Bathing Devices FOR Special Therapeutic OR Hygienic Purposes OR Specific Parts OF THE Body 6

F16H - Gearing 6

A61G - Transport, Personal Conveyances, OR Accommodation Specially Adapted FOR Patients OR Disabled Persons ; Operating Tables OR CHAIRS; Chairs FOR DENTISTRY; Funeral Devices 6

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 6

F16D - Couplings FOR Transmitting ROTATION; CLUTCHES; Brakes 5

H02K - Dynamo-electric Machines 5

G06N - Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models 3

B62H - Cycle STANDS; Supports OR Holders FOR Parking OR Storing CYCLES; Appliances Preventing OR Indicating Unauthorized USE OR Theft OF CYCLES; Locks Integral With CYCLES; Devices FOR Learning TO Ride Cycles 2

G01N - Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties 2

A63B - Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment 2

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 2

Top 15 of 21 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago's lead technology class is A61F (Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive Device), 50.8% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61F
Ranked #5,463 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago against Plexxikon Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 43.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.