Red Tail Hawk Corporation
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 15 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04R (Loudspeakers, Microphones, Gramophone Pick-ups OR Like Acoustic Electromechanical TRANSDUCERS; Deaf-aid SETS; Public Address Systems).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Red ranks #19,076 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 15 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #19,076
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 36th percentile
- by Innovation Score (31.1/100)
- 20.2
- avg claims per patent
- -93%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R19076 · US Corporation #19,076 · 15 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 15 grants
- MID-PACK #19,076/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Rausch & Pausch
- CPC-NARROW H04R · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 31.1/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 20.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -93% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Rausch & Pausch GmbH (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Red’s 31.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Red
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Red Tail Hawk · this assignee 31
Red Tail Hawk · this assignee
31 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Red's Innovation Score is 31.1/100 (36th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Red?
Each dot is one of Red’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Red’s own 20.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.5 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Red's grants concentrate
Red Tail Hawk Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under H04R (Loudspeakers, Microphones, Gramophone Pick-ups OR Like Acoustic Electromechanical TRANSDUCERS; Deaf-aid SETS; Public Address Systems). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Red sits between Rausch & Pausch GmbH and Research & Design Innovations, LLC.
Who files at Red's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Rausch & Pausch
Rausch & Pausch GmbH
15 patents
- Rave Wireless
Rave Wireless, Inc.
15 patents
- Raytheon Systems
Raytheon Systems Limited
15 patents
- Rebound
Rebound Technologies, Inc.
15 patents
- Redx Pharma
Redx Pharma PLC
15 patents
- Rememdia LC
Rememdia LC
15 patents
- Resmed Asia Pte
ResMed Asia Pte. Ltd.
15 patents
- Research & Design…
Research & Design Innovations, LLC
15 patents
- Red Tail Hawk ◀
Red Tail Hawk Corporation
15 patents
What this shows Red holds 15 patents at rank #19,088, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Red
By rank, the assignees closest to #19,088 in granted patent volume.
- Rausch & Pausch GmbH #19,084 · 15 patents
- Rave Wireless, Inc. #19,085 · 15 patents
- Raytheon Systems Limited #19,086 · 15 patents
- Rebound Technologies, Inc. #19,087 · 15 patents
- Redx Pharma PLC #19,089 · 15 patents
- Rememdia LC #19,090 · 15 patents
- ResMed Asia Pte. Ltd. #19,091 · 15 patents
- Research & Design Innovations, LLC #19,092 · 15 patents
Leaders in H04R (Loudspeakers)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Red's primary technology class.
Red's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
31 36th percentile higher than 36% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 13.3% |
| 2016 | 3 | 20.0% |
| 2017 | 3 | 20.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | 6.7% |
| 2019 | 5 | 33.3% |
| 2021 | 1 | 6.7% |
Which technologies does Red Tail Hawk Corporation patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Red Tail Hawk Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Red Tail Hawk Corporation's lead technology class is H04R (Loudspeakers, Microphones, Gramophone Pick-ups OR Like Acoustic Electromechanical TRANSDUCERS; Deaf-aid SETS; Public Address Systems), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04R
- Ranked #19,076 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Red Tail Hawk Corporation against Rausch & Pausch GmbH, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 31.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.