Where does Rebound Technologies, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Rebound Technologies, Inc. ranks #19,075 of 50,000 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Rebound Technologies, Inc. hold?

Rebound Technologies, Inc. holds 15 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2025, spanning 21 technology areas.

What is Rebound Technologies, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Rebound Technologies, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 48.0 out of 100 (top 17% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Rebound Technologies, Inc. focus on?

Rebound Technologies, Inc.'s top technology area is F25C (PRODUCING, WORKING OR HANDLING ICE) with 6 patents. Grants appear in 21 CPC subclasses total.

Is Rebound Technologies, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Rebound Technologies, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +267% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Rebound Technologies, Inc.'s patents?

Rebound Technologies, Inc.'s patents average 17.5 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Rebound Technologies, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Rebound Technologies, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 15 granted patents across 21 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F25C (PRODUCING, WORKING OR HANDLING ICE).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Rebound ranks #19,075 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 15 patents across 21 technology areas.

#19,075
of 50,000 US assignees by volume: Top 17%
by Innovation Score (48.0/100): 17.5
avg claims per patent: +267%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R19075 · US Corporation #19,075 · 15 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 15 grants
MID-PACK #19,075/50,000
PHOTO-FINISH Rappaport Family Ins…
CPC-FOCUS F25C · 21 areas
INNOV-PAR 48.0/100
CLAIMS-RICH 17.5 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +267% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Rappaport Family Institute For Research In The Medical Sciences (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Rebound · this assignee

48
3D Lighting Innovati… · lowest

7

What this shows Rebound Technologies, Inc. stamps GRANTS-MICRO, MID-PACK, PHOTO-FINISH, CPC-FOCUS, INNOV-PAR, CLAIMS-RICH, TYPE-USCORP, VEL-SURGE, BOOK-FULL. Volume places it #19,075 of 50,000; Innovation Score 48.0/100 sits in the top 17% of the PatentsView-derived corpus. Closest grant-volume peer on this plate is Rappaport Family Institute For Research In The Medical Sciences (±0 grants).

Portfolio overview

Rebound Technologies, Inc. has been granted 15 US utility patents between 2016 and 2025, placing Rebound Technologies, Inc. at #19,075 of 50,000 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 21 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 17.5 claims per patent with primary concentration in F25C (PRODUCING, WORKING OR HANDLING ICE). As a US Corporation, Rebound Technologies, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Rebound sits between Rappaport Family Institute For Research In The Medical Sciences (15 patents, rank #19,083) and Resmed Asia Pte. Ltd. (15 patents, rank #19,091) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 48.0/100 blends portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Grant cadence records the difference between two grant-year windows. Between 2020 and 2024 the company received 11 grants, compared with 3 in the 2015–2019 window, a +267% shift in five-year grant velocity. Both windows cover five complete grant years; the latest PatentsView year is a partial release and is excluded from this comparison, though it still appears in the yearly table and chart below. Grant timing can lag the related application by years, so this comparison does not establish current R&D spending, strategic intent, or a company’s application activity. The US Corporation classification provides context for the assignee record, not a conclusion about its business strategy.

Claim depth and technology breadth describe this aggregate record. Rebound Technologies, Inc.'s 17.5 average claims per patent is an average count, not a measure of claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk. The record spans 21 CPC subclasses. Combined with portfolio volume, these figures let readers compare the documented grant records of assignees in similar technology classes.

Rappaport Family…

15
Rausch & Pausch

15
Rave Wireless

15
Raytheon Systems

15
Red Tail Hawk

15
Redx Pharma

15
Rememdia LC

15
Resmed Asia Pte

15
Rebound ◀

15

What this shows Rebound holds 15 patents at rank #19,087, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Rebound

By rank, the assignees closest to #19,087 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F25C (Producing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Rebound's primary technology class.

Rebound's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

48 Top 17% higher than 83% of 50,000 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Rebound Technologies, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	2	13.3%
2018	1	6.7%
2020	2	13.3%
2021	2	13.3%
2022	5	33.3%
2024	2	13.3%
2025partial year	1	6.7%

Which technologies does Rebound Technologies, Inc. patent most?

F25C - PRODUCING, WORKING OR HANDLING ICE 6

F25D - REFRIGERATORS; COLD ROOMS; ICE-BOXES; COOLING OR FREEZING APPARATUS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR 5

F28D - HEAT-EXCHANGE APPARATUS, NOT PROVIDED FOR IN ANOTHER SUBCLASS, IN WHICH THE HEAT-EXCHANGE MEDIA DO NOT COME INTO DIRECT CONTACT 4

Y02E - REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION 4

F25B - REFRIGERATION MACHINES, PLANTS OR SYSTEMS; COMBINED HEATING AND REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS; HEAT PUMP SYSTEMS 4

H02S - GENERATION OF ELECTRIC POWER BY CONVERSION OF INFRARED RADIATION, VISIBLE LIGHT OR ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT, e.g. USING PHOTOVOLTAIC [PV] MODULES 3

F05D - INDEXING SCHEME FOR ASPECTS RELATING TO NON-POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, GAS-TURBINES OR JET-PROPULSION PLANTS 3

F24S - SOLAR HEAT COLLECTORS; SOLAR HEAT SYSTEMS 3

F03G - SPRING, WEIGHT, INERTIA OR LIKE MOTORS; MECHANICAL-POWER PRODUCING DEVICES OR MECHANISMS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR OR USING ENERGY SOURCES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR 3

H01M - PROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY 3

F01D - NON-POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, e.g. STEAM TURBINES 3

F01K - STEAM ENGINE PLANTS; STEAM ACCUMULATORS; ENGINE PLANTS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; ENGINES USING SPECIAL WORKING FLUIDS OR CYCLES 3

F24F - AIR-CONDITIONING; AIR-HUMIDIFICATION; VENTILATION; USE OF AIR CURRENTS FOR SCREENING 3

F28F - DETAILS OF HEAT-EXCHANGE AND HEAT-TRANSFER APPARATUS, OF GENERAL APPLICATION 2

C09K - MATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE 2

Top 15 of 21 technology areas

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#19,075

of 50,000 tracked assignees

Innovation Score

48.0 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.