Overall rank by patents
#49,601
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 2 technology areas, active 2015–2022. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A61F (FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE).
The verdict
PRO holds 5 US patents across 2 technology areas, rank #49,601 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
PRO LIMB International Corp. has been granted 5 US utility patents between 2015 and 2022, placing PRO LIMB International Corp. at rank #49,601 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 2 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 9.8 claims per patent with primary concentration in A61F (FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE). As a Foreign Corporation, PRO LIMB International Corp. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, PRO sits between Prisma Health—upstate (5 patents, rank #49,597) and Progress Maschinen & Automation Ag (5 patents, rank #49,605) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 20.4/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 2 grants, compared with 3 in the 2015–2019 window, a -33% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. PRO LIMB International Corp.'s 9.8 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while specialization in 2 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark PRO LIMB International Corp. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
PRISMA HEALTH—UPSTATE
5 patents
PRISMLAB CHINA LTD.
5 patents
PRIVATE BRAND TOOLS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
5 patents
PRO DECOR LLC
5 patents
PROCARTA BIOSYSTEMS LTD.
5 patents
PRODUITS DENTAIRES PIERRE ROLLAND
5 patents
PROFESSIONAL RENTAL TOOLS, LLC
5 patents
PROGRESS MASCHINEN & AUTOMATION AG
5 patents
PRO LIMB INTERNATIONAL CORP.
5 patents
What this shows PRO holds 5 patents at rank #49,601, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #49,601 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in PRO's primary technology class.
PRO's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
20 Top 93% higher than 7% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2021 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | 20.0% |
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#49,601
Across all tracked assignees
20.4 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
PRO's 5 grants land it in the top 93% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.