Overall rank by patents
#49,770
of 49,997 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B33Y (Additive Manufacturing, i.e. Manufacturing OF Three-dimensional [3-D] Objects BY Additive Deposition, Additive Agglomeration OR Additive Layering, e.g. BY 3-D Printing, Stereolithography OR Selective ).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Prismlab ranks #49,770 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 7 technology areas.
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R49770 · Foreign Corporation #49,770 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
Nearest grant-volume peer: Prism Fitness, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
Prismlab China · this assignee
30 score
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Prismlab's Innovation Score is 30.5/100 (35th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Prismlab China Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under B33Y (Additive Manufacturing, i.e. Manufacturing OF Three-dimensional [3-D] Objects BY Additive Deposition, Additive Agglomeration OR Additive Layering, e.g. BY 3-D Printing, Stereolithography OR Selective ). By volume, Prismlab sits between Prism Fitness, Inc. and Procarta Biosystems Ltd..
Prismlab China Ltd. shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Prism Fitness, Inc.
5 patents
Prism Pharma Co., Ltd.
5 patents
Prism Technologies LLC
5 patents
Prisma HEALTH—UPSTATE
5 patents
Private Brand Tools Australia PTY Ltd
5 patents
PRO Decor LLC
5 patents
PRO Limb International Corp.
5 patents
Procarta Biosystems Ltd.
5 patents
Prismlab China Ltd.
5 patents
What this shows Prismlab holds 5 patents at rank #49,598, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #49,598 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Prismlab's primary technology class.
Prismlab's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
30 35th percentile higher than 35% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2021 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2023 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2024 | 1 | 20.0% |
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#49,770
of 49,997 tracked assignees
30.5 out of 100
What to do with this data
Prismlab China Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.