Prism Technologies LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Prism ranks #49,768 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #49,768
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 27th percentile
- by Innovation Score (28.3/100)
- 38.6
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R49768 · US Corporation #49,768 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #49,768/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Primo1d
- CPC-NARROW G06F · 4 areas
- INNOV-THIN 28.3/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 38.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Primo1d (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Prism’s 28.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Prism
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Prism · this assignee 28
Prism · this assignee
28 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Prism's Innovation Score is 28.3/100 (27th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Prism?
Each dot is one of Prism’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Prism’s own 38.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Prism's grants concentrate
Prism Technologies LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Prism sits between Primo1d and PRO Decor LLC.
Who files at Prism's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Primo1d
Primo1d
5 patents
- Printeron
Printeron Inc.
5 patents
- Prism Fitness
Prism Fitness, Inc.
5 patents
- Prism Pharma
Prism Pharma Co., Ltd.
5 patents
- Prisma Health—Ups…
Prisma HEALTH—UPSTATE
5 patents
- Prismlab China
Prismlab China Ltd.
5 patents
- Private Brand Too…
Private Brand Tools Australia PTY Ltd
5 patents
- PRO Decor
PRO Decor LLC
5 patents
- Prism ◀
Prism Technologies LLC
5 patents
What this shows Prism holds 5 patents at rank #49,596, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Prism
By rank, the assignees closest to #49,596 in granted patent volume.
- Primo1d #49,592 · 5 patents
- Printeron Inc. #49,593 · 5 patents
- Prism Fitness, Inc. #49,594 · 5 patents
- Prism Pharma Co., Ltd. #49,595 · 5 patents
- Prisma HEALTH—UPSTATE #49,597 · 5 patents
- Prismlab China Ltd. #49,598 · 5 patents
- Private Brand Tools Australia PTY Ltd #49,599 · 5 patents
- PRO Decor LLC #49,600 · 5 patents
Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Prism's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 42,717 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 21,497 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 16,951 in class
- Google LLC 13,092 in class
- Intel Corporation 12,803 in class
- Apple Inc. 11,007 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 10,217 in class
- Dell Products L.P. 7,187 in class
Prism's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
28 27th percentile higher than 27% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2017 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does Prism Technologies LLC patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Prism Technologies LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Prism Technologies LLC's lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
- Ranked #49,768 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Prism Technologies LLC against Primo1d, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 28.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.