Where does Polestar Performance AB rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Polestar Performance AB ranks #2,531 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Polestar Performance AB hold?

Polestar Performance AB holds 154 US utility patents granted between 2019 and 2025, spanning 12 technology areas.

What is Polestar Performance AB's Innovation Score?

Polestar Performance AB has an Innovation Score of 51.4 out of 100 (top 11% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Polestar Performance AB's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Polestar Performance AB's recent grant velocity is +4533% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Polestar Performance AB's patents?

Polestar Performance AB's patents average 2.9 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Polestar Performance AB patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Polestar Performance AB

Q: What technology areas does Polestar Performance AB focus on?

Polestar Performance AB's top technology area is H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy) with 9 patents, ranking #571 of 2,332 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 12 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 154 granted patents across 12 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Polestar ranks #2,531 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 154 patents across 12 technology areas.

#2,531
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 11%
by Innovation Score (51.4/100): 2.9
avg claims per patent: +4533%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R2531 · Foreign Corporation #2,531 · 154 grants

GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MID 154 grants
TOP-DECILE #2,531/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Life Spine
CPC-FOCUS H01M · 12 areas
INNOV-PAR 51.4/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 2.9 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +4533% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Life Spine, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Polestar’s 51.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 17.4 pts (34%) Velocity 20.0 pts (39%) Breadth 12.2 pts (24%) Claim depth 1.8 pts (4%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Edwards Vacuum · near

51
Nanning Fugui… · near

51
Peregrine Semiconduc… · near

51
Polestar Performance… · this assignee

51
Unmanned Innovations · near

51
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Polestar's Innovation Score is 51.4/100 (top 11% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Polestar?

Each dot is one of Polestar’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Polestar’s own 2.9 claims/patent is at or below the 16.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Polestar vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Polestar's grants concentrate

Polestar Performance AB is a focused PatentsView assignee: 12 CPC subclasses with 5.8% of grants classified under H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (43 grants) versus a trough of 3 in 2019. By volume, Polestar sits between Lyten, Inc. and Valeo Embrayages.

Polestar's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Polestar Performance AB moved from 27 to 115 grants (4.26x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #38. See the growth leaderboard.

Lyten

154
Life Spine

154
Melexis

154
Oregon State Univ…

154
Rehrig Pacific

154
SAE Magnetics (H…

154
Technip France

154
Valeo Embrayages

154
Polestar Performa… ◀

154

What this shows Polestar holds 154 patents at rank #2,531, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Polestar

By rank, the assignees closest to #2,531 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H01M (Processes OR Means)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Polestar's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Polestar, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In H01M (Processes OR Means), Polestar ranks #571 of 2,332 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (51 here).

Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation 51 Nanning Fugui Precision Industrial Co., Ltd. 51 Edwards Vacuum LLC 51 Unmanned Innovations, Inc. 51

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (2.9 here).

Leapfrog Product Development LLC 2.9 avg Ningbo Well Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. 3.0 avg Metra Electronics Corp. 2.9 avg Guangdong Gopod Group Holding Co., Ltd. 2.9 avg

Polestar's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

51 Top 11% higher than 89% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Polestar Performance AB patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2019	3	1.9%
2020	10	6.5%
2021	14	9.1%
2022	35	22.7%
2023	43	27.9%
2024	37	24.0%
2025partial year	12	7.8%

Which technologies does Polestar Performance AB patent most?

H01M - Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy 9

Y02E - Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution 7

B60L - Propulsion OF Electrically-propelled Vehicles ; Supplying Electric Power FOR Auxiliary Equipment OF Electrically-propelled Vehicles ; Electrodynamic Brake Systems FOR Vehicles IN General ; Magnetic Suspension OR Levitation FOR VEHICLES; Monitoring Operating Variables OF Electrically-propelled Vehicl 6

B60K - Arrangement OR Mounting OF Propulsion Units OR OF Transmissions IN VEHICLES; Arrangement OR Mounting OF Plural Diverse Prime-movers IN VEHICLES; Auxiliary Drives FOR VEHICLES; Instrumentation OR Dashboards FOR VEHICLES; Arrangements IN Connection With Cooling, AIR Intake, GAS Exhaust OR Fuel Supply 6

B60R - Vehicles, Vehicle Fittings, OR Vehicle Parts, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 5

B62D - Motor VEHICLES; Trailers 3

Y02T - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies Related TO Transportation 3

H02J - Circuit Arrangements OR Systems FOR Supplying OR Distributing Electric POWER; Systems FOR Storing Electric Energy 3

B60N - Seats Specially Adapted FOR VEHICLES; Vehicle Passenger Accommodation NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

Y02P - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods 1

F16D - Couplings FOR Transmitting ROTATION; CLUTCHES; Brakes 1

F16H - Gearing 1

Top 12 of 12 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Polestar Performance AB's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Polestar Performance AB's lead technology class is H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy), 5.8% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H01M
Ranked #2,531 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Polestar Performance AB against Lyten, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 51.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.