Where does PLSense Ltd. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), PLSense Ltd. ranks #32,887 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does PLSense Ltd. hold?

PLSense Ltd. holds 8 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2020, spanning 10 technology areas.

What is PLSense Ltd.'s Innovation Score?

PLSense Ltd. has an Innovation Score of 25.6 out of 100 (18th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does PLSense Ltd. focus on?

PLSense Ltd.'s top technology area is H03K (Pulse Technique) with 5 patents, ranking #425 of 1,682 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 10 CPC subclasses total.

Is PLSense Ltd.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

PLSense Ltd.'s recent grant velocity is -86% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for PLSense Ltd.'s patents?

PLSense Ltd.'s patents average 11.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the PLSense Ltd. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

PLSense Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 10 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H03K (Pulse Technique).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Plsense ranks #32,887 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 10 technology areas.

#32,887
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 18th percentile
by Innovation Score (25.6/100): 11.4
avg claims per patent: -86%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R32887 · Foreign Corporation #32,887 · 8 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
MID-PACK #32,887/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Plastpro 2000
CPC-FOCUS H03K · 10 areas
INNOV-THIN 25.6/100
CLAIMS-PAR 11.4 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -86% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Plastpro 2000, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Plsense’s 25.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.6 pts (30%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 11.2 pts (44%) Claim depth 6.8 pts (27%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
PLSense · this assignee

26
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Plsense's Innovation Score is 25.6/100 (18th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Plsense?

Each dot is one of Plsense’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Plsense’s own 11.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 9.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Plsense vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Plsense's grants concentrate

PLSense Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 10 CPC subclasses with 62.5% of grants classified under H03K (Pulse Technique). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Plsense sits between Plastpro 2000, Inc. and Polypas International PTY Ltd.

Plastpro 2000

8
Platypus

8
Pleut Pieds

8
Plex

8
POC Sweden AB

8
Polaris Group

8
Polymatech Japan

8
Polypas Internati…

8
Plsense ◀

8

What this shows PLSense holds 8 patents at rank #32,822, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near PLSense

By rank, the assignees closest to #32,822 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H03K (Pulse Technique)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in PLSense's primary technology class.

Plsense's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

26 18th percentile higher than 18% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2020

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

PLSense Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	1	12.5%
2017	1	12.5%
2018	4	50.0%
2019	1	12.5%
2020	1	12.5%

Which technologies does PLSense Ltd. patent most?

H03K - Pulse Technique 5

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 3

G01R - Measuring Electric VARIABLES; Measuring Magnetic Variables 2

G09G - Arrangements OR Circuits FOR Control OF Indicating Devices Using Static Means TO Present Variable Information 1

G05F - Systems FOR Regulating Electric OR Magnetic Variables 1

H10B - Electronic Memory Devices 1

H03L - Automatic Control, Starting, Synchronisation OR Stabilisation OF Generators OF Electronic Oscillations OR Pulses 1

H02M - Apparatus FOR Conversion Between AC AND AC, Between AC AND DC, OR Between DC AND DC, AND FOR USE With Mains OR Similar Power Supply SYSTEMS; Conversion OF DC OR AC Input Power Into Surge Output POWER; Control OR Regulation Thereof 1

Y02B - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies Related TO Buildings, e.g. Housing, House Appliances OR Related End-user Applications 1

H03B - Generation OF Oscillations, Directly OR BY Frequency-changing, BY Circuits Employing Active Elements Which Operate IN A Non-switching MANNER; Generation OF Noise BY Such Circuits 1

Top 10 of 10 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

PLSense Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

PLSense Ltd.'s lead technology class is H03K (Pulse Technique), 62.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H03K
Ranked #32,887 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare PLSense Ltd. against Plastpro 2000, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 25.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.