USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

POC Sweden AB

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B60Q (Arrangement OF Signalling OR Lighting Devices, THE Mounting OR Supporting Thereof OR Circuits Therefor, FOR Vehicles IN General).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, POC ranks #32,888 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 5 technology areas.

#32,888
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
5th percentile
by Innovation Score (18.9/100)
5.8
avg claims per patent
-80%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R32888 · Foreign Corporation #32,888 · 8 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
  • MID-PACK #32,888/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Platypus
  • CPC-NARROW B60Q · 5 areas
  • INNOV-LOW 18.9/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 5.8 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DROP -80% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Platypus Technologies, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How POC’s 18.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around POC

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows POC's Innovation Score is 18.9/100 (5th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for POC?

Each dot is one of POC’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). POC’s own 5.8 claims/patent is at or below the 9.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

POC vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 8.088.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Platypus Technologies, LLC - 8, 15.5PlatypusPleut Pieds LLC - 8, 1Pleut PiedsPlex Corporation - 8, 12.38PlexPLSense Ltd. - 8, 11.38PlsensePolaris Group - 8, 22Polaris GroupPolymatech Japan Co., Ltd. - 8, 8.38Polymatech JapanPolypas International PTY Ltd - 8, 9.62Polypas Internati…POP Test LLC - 8, 8.12POP TestPOC Sweden AB - 8, 5.75POC Sweden AB
POC vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where POC's grants concentrate

POC Sweden AB is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 12.5% of grants classified under B60Q (Arrangement OF Signalling OR Lighting Devices, THE Mounting OR Supporting Thereof OR Circuits Therefor, FOR Vehicles IN General). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, POC sits between Platypus Technologies, LLC and POP Test LLC.

Who files at POC's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows POC holds 8 patents at rank #32,823, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near POC

By rank, the assignees closest to #32,823 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B60Q (Arrangement OF Signalling OR Lighting Devices)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in POC's primary technology class.

POC's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

19 5th percentile higher than 5% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.533.5 20152018201920212025 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
POC Sweden AB patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 1 12.5%
2018 3 37.5%
2019 1 12.5%
2021 1 12.5%
2025partial year 2 25.0%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

POC Sweden AB's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • POC Sweden AB's lead technology class is B60Q (Arrangement OF Signalling OR Lighting Devices, THE Mounting OR Supporting Thereof OR Circuits Therefor, FOR Vehicles IN General), 12.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B60Q
  • Ranked #32,888 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare POC Sweden AB against Platypus Technologies, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 18.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.