Parker Hannifin Manufacturing Limited
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 19 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Parker ranks #24,977 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 19 technology areas.
- #24,977
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 39th percentile
- by Innovation Score (31.9/100)
- 13.2
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R24977 · Foreign Corporation #24,977 · 11 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 11 grants
- MID-PACK #24,977/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Pandion Operations
- CPC-FOCUS Y10T · 19 areas
- INNOV-THIN 31.9/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 13.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Pandion Operations, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Parker’s 31.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Parker
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Parker Hannifin… · this assignee 32
Parker Hannifin… · this assignee
32 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Parker's Innovation Score is 31.9/100 (39th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Parker?
Each dot is one of Parker’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Parker’s own 13.2 claims/patent is at or below the 14.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Parker's grants concentrate
Parker Hannifin Manufacturing Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 19 CPC subclasses with 36.4% of grants classified under Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (4 grants) versus a trough of 3 in 2017. By volume, Parker sits between Pandion Operations, Inc. and Peptilogics, Inc..
Who files at Parker's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Pandion Operations
Pandion Operations, Inc.
11 patents
- Paper-pak Industr…
Paper-Pak Industries
11 patents
- Paradigm Health a…
Paradigm Health and Wellness
11 patents
- Parenteral
Parenteral Technologies, LLC
11 patents
- Pattern Bioscience
Pattern Bioscience, Inc.
11 patents
- Pendotech
PendoTECH
11 patents
- Peptidream
PeptiDream Inc.
11 patents
- Peptilogics
Peptilogics, Inc.
11 patents
- Parker Hannifin M… ◀
Parker Hannifin Manufacturing Limited
11 patents
What this shows Parker holds 11 patents at rank #24,988, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Parker
By rank, the assignees closest to #24,988 in granted patent volume.
- Pandion Operations, Inc. #24,984 · 11 patents
- Paper-Pak Industries #24,985 · 11 patents
- Paradigm Health and Wellness #24,986 · 11 patents
- Parenteral Technologies, LLC #24,987 · 11 patents
- Pattern Bioscience, Inc. #24,989 · 11 patents
- PendoTECH #24,990 · 11 patents
- PeptiDream Inc. #24,991 · 11 patents
- Peptilogics, Inc. #24,992 · 11 patents
Leaders in Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Parker's primary technology class.
Parker's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
32 39th percentile higher than 39% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 4 | 36.4% |
| 2017 | 3 | 27.3% |
| 2018 | 4 | 36.4% |
Which technologies does Parker Hannifin Manufacturing Limited patent most?
Top 15 of 19 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Parker Hannifin Manufacturing Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Parker Hannifin Manufacturing Limited's lead technology class is Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification), 36.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore Y10T
- Ranked #24,977 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Parker Hannifin Manufacturing Limited against Pandion Operations, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 31.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.