Orth Consulting, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 10 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2021–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B01J (Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Orth ranks #32,772 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 10 technology areas.
- #32,772
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 47%
- by Innovation Score (36.2/100)
- 17.9
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R32772 · US Corporation #32,772 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #32,772/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Orbray
- CPC-FOCUS B01J · 10 areas
- INNOV-THIN 36.2/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 17.9 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2021–2024 · 4y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Orbray Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Orth’s 36.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Orth
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Orth Consulting · this assignee
Orth Consulting · this assignee
36 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Orth's Innovation Score is 36.2/100 (top 47% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Orth?
Each dot is one of Orth’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Orth’s own 17.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Orth's grants concentrate
Orth Consulting, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 10 CPC subclasses with 75% of grants classified under B01J (Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (4 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2022. By volume, Orth sits between Orbray Co., Ltd. and Osborne Industries Inc..
Orth's three-year grant acceleration
Orth Consulting, LLC shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Orth's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Orbray
Orbray Co., Ltd.
8 patents
- Orchid Exchange
Orchid Exchange Inc.
8 patents
- Orexigen Therapeu…
Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.
8 patents
- Orgenesis
Orgenesis Inc.
8 patents
- Ortho Development
Ortho Development Corporation
8 patents
- Orthodyne
Orthodyne Electronics Corporation
8 patents
- Ortiz and Associa…
Ortiz and Associates Consulting, LLC
8 patents
- Osborne Industries
Osborne Industries Inc.
8 patents
- Orth Consulting ◀
Orth Consulting, LLC
8 patents
What this shows Orth holds 8 patents at rank #32,763, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Orth
By rank, the assignees closest to #32,763 in granted patent volume.
- Orbray Co., Ltd. #32,759 · 8 patents
- Orchid Exchange Inc. #32,760 · 8 patents
- Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc. #32,761 · 8 patents
- Orgenesis Inc. #32,762 · 8 patents
- Ortho Development Corporation #32,764 · 8 patents
- Orthodyne Electronics Corporation #32,765 · 8 patents
- Ortiz and Associates Consulting, LLC #32,766 · 8 patents
- Osborne Industries Inc. #32,767 · 8 patents
Leaders in B01J (Chemical OR Physical Processes)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Orth's primary technology class.
Orth's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
36 Top 47% higher than 53% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2021–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 2022 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2024 | 2 | 25.0% |
Which technologies does Orth Consulting, LLC patent most?
Top 10 of 10 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Orth Consulting, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Orth Consulting, LLC's lead technology class is B01J (Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus), 75% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B01J
- Ranked #32,772 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Orth Consulting, LLC against Orbray Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 36.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.