Orbital Sciences Corporation
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 12 granted patents across 13 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H01Q (Antennas, i.e. Radio Aerials).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Orbital ranks #23,145 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 12 patents across 13 technology areas.
- #23,145
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 44th percentile
- by Innovation Score (33.4/100)
- 19.7
- avg claims per patent
- -91%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R23145 · US Corporation #23,145 · 12 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 12 grants
- MID-PACK #23,145/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Onstream Media
- CPC-FOCUS H01Q · 13 areas
- INNOV-THIN 33.4/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 19.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -91% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Onstream Media Corporation (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Orbital’s 33.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Orbital
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Orbital Sciences · this assignee 33
Orbital Sciences · this assignee
33 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Orbital's Innovation Score is 33.4/100 (44th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Orbital?
Each dot is one of Orbital’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Orbital’s own 19.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Orbital's grants concentrate
Orbital Sciences Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 13 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under H01Q (Antennas, i.e. Radio Aerials). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Orbital sits between Onstream Media Corporation and Orphazyme A/S.
Who files at Orbital's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Onstream Media
Onstream Media Corporation
12 patents
- Opendoor Labs
Opendoor Labs Inc.
12 patents
- Orangedot
OrangeDot, Inc.
12 patents
- Orangebox
Orangebox Limited
12 patents
- Orbital Traction
Orbital Traction, Ltd.
12 patents
- Oregon Tool
Oregon Tool, Inc.
12 patents
- Origami Owl
Origami Owl, LLC
12 patents
- Orphazyme A/S
Orphazyme A/S
12 patents
- Orbital Sciences ◀
Orbital Sciences Corporation
12 patents
What this shows Orbital holds 12 patents at rank #23,143, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Orbital
By rank, the assignees closest to #23,143 in granted patent volume.
- Onstream Media Corporation #23,139 · 12 patents
- Opendoor Labs Inc. #23,140 · 12 patents
- OrangeDot, Inc. #23,141 · 12 patents
- Orangebox Limited #23,142 · 12 patents
- Orbital Traction, Ltd. #23,144 · 12 patents
- Oregon Tool, Inc. #23,145 · 12 patents
- Origami Owl, LLC #23,146 · 12 patents
- Orphazyme A/S #23,147 · 12 patents
Leaders in H01Q (Antennas)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Orbital's primary technology class.
- Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 680 in class
- Apple Inc. 594 in class
- Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. 570 in class
- Commscope Technologies LLC 457 in class
- AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. 359 in class
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) 294 in class
- Raytheon Company 291 in class
- Wistron Neweb Corp. 260 in class
Orbital's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
33 44th percentile higher than 44% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 16.7% |
| 2016 | 2 | 16.7% |
| 2017 | 4 | 33.3% |
| 2018 | 2 | 16.7% |
| 2019 | 1 | 8.3% |
| 2020 | 1 | 8.3% |
Which technologies does Orbital Sciences Corporation patent most?
Top 13 of 13 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Orbital Sciences Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Orbital Sciences Corporation's lead technology class is H01Q (Antennas, i.e. Radio Aerials), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H01Q
- Ranked #23,145 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Orbital Sciences Corporation against Onstream Media Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 33.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.